PREVENTIF STATE ASSET MANAGEMENT VS SULTAN GROUND: A STUDY CASE IN SPECIAL REGION OF YOGYAKARTA

Authors

  • Aditya Wirawan Department of Financial Management, POLITEKNIK KEUANGAN NEGARA STAN, INDONESIA
  • Taufik Raharjo Department of Financial Management, POLITEKNIK KEUANGAN NEGARA STAN, INDONESIA
  • Roby Syaiful Ubed Department of Financial Management, POLITEKNIK KEUANGAN NEGARA STAN, INDONESIA
  • Retno Yuliati Department of Accounting, UNIVERSITAS PRASETIYA MULYA, INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i17.1023

Keywords:

State Asset Management, Sultanate Ground, Dispute Resolution, State Asset Management policy

Abstract

This research uses principal negotiation theory to identify further a dispute emerging between the state asset manager, the central government, and the special local government, the sultanate government. This study examines the dispute resolution and the implementation of the dispute resolution between applying the Yogyakarta Privileges Act to the management of State Property. This research uses study literature, secondary data and then is analyzed qualitatively. This study explains that dispute resolution outside the court is more effective and efficient in managing state property. The costs incurred are enormous, and the time required is extensive. Therefore, it is better to immediately design policies, breakthroughs, and arrangements for resolving disputes between state property and sultanate ground. This study was conducted in the Indonesian context. However, the study's findings may not be generalizable to State Asset Management in other countries, especially the Western ones. These findings are likely to have significant implications for State Asset Management in designing and implementing how to resolve dispute problems in asset management in the unique region of Yogyakarta.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, R., & Humphrey, B. (2005). Asset Management for Transmission and Distribution. Amerika: IEEE Power & energy Magazine.

Farida, Maria Indrat Soeprapto. (2010). Ilmu Perundang-undangan,Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

HIR (Het Herziene Indonesisch Reglement) / Reglemen Indonesia yg diperbaharui : S. 1848 no. 16, S. 1941 no. 44,

Kelsen, Hans. (2008). Teori Hukum Murni : Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif Bandung PT. Rineke Cipta

Puspitarini, I & Heru Akhmadi, M. (2019). Measuring Public Asset Performance Using Output-Based Approach: Evidence From Indonesia. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners Volume 17 Issue 1 (2019), Page 292 - 304

Rbg (Rechtsreglement Buitengewesten) / Reglemen daerah seberang : S. 1927 no. 227, RO (Reglement op de Rechterlijke Organisatie in hed beleid der Justitie in Indonesie) / Reglemen tentang Organisasi Kehakiman : S. 1847 no. 23, Rv (Reglement op de Burgerlijke rechtsvordering) : S. 1847 no. 52, S. 1849 no. 63,

Sihombing, Eka N.A.M. (2016). Menyoal Ketentuan Usul Pindah Pegawai Negeri Sipil di Lingkungan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Nias Barat. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan HAM Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI dan Ikatan Peneliti Hukum Indonesia (IPHI).

Translated by B.L. Paulson and S.L. Paulson as Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory (Oxford, Clarendon P., 1992); the German subtitle is used as the English title, to distinguish this book from the second edition of Reine Rechtslehre, translated by Max Knight as Pure Theory of Law (Berkeley, U. California P., 1967)

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 yang telah diamandemen keempat.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 tentang Perbendaharaan Negara

Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2012 tentang Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 1947 Pengadilan Peradilan Ulangan,

Undang-Undang Nomor 14 tahun 1970 tentang Ketentuan-ketentuan Pokok Kekuasaan Kehakiman joucto Undang-Undang Nomor 48 tahun 2009 tentang perubahan kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 tahun 1970 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Undang-Undang Nomor 14 tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung joucto Undang-Undang Nomor 3 tahun 2009 tentang perubahan kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung,

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum joucto Undang-Undang Nomor 49 tahun 2009 tentang perubahan kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum

Downloads

Published

2021-10-17

How to Cite

Wirawan, A., Raharjo, T., Ubed, R. S., & Yuliati, R. (2021). PREVENTIF STATE ASSET MANAGEMENT VS SULTAN GROUND: A STUDY CASE IN SPECIAL REGION OF YOGYAKARTA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 19(17). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i17.1023