MODEL OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSING BEHAVIOUR BASED ON ROAD TRAFFIC AND HUMAN FACTORS: A CASE STUDY OF MALAYSIA’S SHAH ALAM CITY

Authors

  • Na’asah Nasrudin Town Planning Studies, School of Town Planning and Landscape Architecture, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA PUNCAK ALAM
  • Nurul Shakila Khalid Town Planning Studies, School of Town Planning and Landscape Architecture, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA PUNCAK ALAM
  • Yusfida Ayu Abdullah Town Planning Studies, School of Town Planning and Landscape Architecture, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA PUNCAK ALAM
  • Marlyana Azzyati Marzukhi Town Planning Studies, School of Town Planning and Landscape Architecture, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA PUNCAK ALAM
  • Seng Boon Lim Programme of Town and Regional Planning, Department of Built Environment studies and Technology, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA PERAK BRANCH SERI ISKANDAR CAMPUS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i29.1354

Keywords:

Pedestrian crossing, Pedestrian crossing behaviour, Human factors, Pedestrian behaviour

Abstract

The present study intends to develop pedestrian crossing behaviour models based on road traffic and human factors. A questionnaire was distributed to 663 pedestrians in Shah Alam. Respondents were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their risk perceptions and attitudes pertaining to walking and road crossings. This study identified two human factors that influenced pedestrian crossing behaviour: the “risk-taker” and the “rule-follower.” The modelling analysis revealed a substantial correlation between human factors and crossing behaviour. Analysis of pedestrian crossing behaviour is useful to evaluate the implementation of novel pedestrian crossing environments. The study offers insights applicable to urban planning and policy approaches for reducing pedestrian accidents by utilising strategies such as extended signal timing, audible signals, countdown timers, and optimising intersection design to improve pedestrian safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ab. Rahman R, Thani S.K.S.O, & Roslan R. (2019). Identifying Characters of Good Street for Greater Urban Quality of Life. Procedia - Asian Journal of Quality of Life (AjQoL) Vol 4 No 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/ajqol.v4i15.184

Azmi, D.I., & Abdul Karim, H.(2018) Promoting Sustainable Urban Neighborhood towards Walkability., Asian Journal of Environment -Behaviour Studies (ajE-Bs), 3(8)167-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/aje-bs.v3i8.290

Bernhoft I.M., Carstensen G. (2008). Preferences and behaviour of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender. Transportation Research Part F 11,pp. 83-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2007.08.004

C. Fornell, and D. F. Larcker (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables And Measurement Error., Journal of Marketing Research (18:1)39-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Chu X., Guttenplan M., and Baltes M. R.,(2003) “Why people cross where they do: the role of street environment,” Transportation Research Record, no. 1878, pp. 3–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/1878-01

Diaz, E.M. (2002). Theory of planned behaviour and pedestrians’ intentions to violate traffic regulations. Transportation Research Part F 5, 169– 175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00015-3

Elvik R., Sorensen M. W. J. and Naevestad T.-O., (2013). “Factors influencing safety in a sample of marked pedestrian crossings selected for safety inspections in the city of Oslo,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 59, pp. 64–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.011

Evans, D., Norman P. (1998). Understanding pedestrians' road crossing decisions: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Health Education Research 13 (4), pp. 481-489.

Evans D., Norman P. (1998). Understanding pedestrians’ road crossing decisions: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Health Education Research 13 (4), pp. 481-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/her/13.4.481-a

Fuller R., Santos J.A. (2002). Human Factors for Highway Engineers. Elsevier Science, UK.

Nassiri H. and Sajed Y. (2009), “Using a logit model to predict pedestrian crossing behaviour based upon vehicle speed and headway on the multi-lane street," in Proceedings of the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.

Papadimitriou E., Theofilatos A., Yannis G. (2013). Patterns of pedestrian attitudes, perceptions and behaviour in Europe. Safety Science 53, pp. 114-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.09.008

Sisiopiku, V.P., Akin, D., 2003. Pedestrian behaviours at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: an examination based on observation and survey data. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 6, 249– 274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2003.06.001

Shriver K,(1997). "Influence of environmental design on pedestrian travel behaviour in four Austin neighbourhoods," Transportation Research Record, no. 1578, pp. 64–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/1578-09

Yagil, D. (2000). Beliefs, motives and situational factors related to pedestrians' self-reported behaviour at signal-controlled crossings. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 3 (1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00004-8

Yannis G., Golias J., and Papadimitriou E., (2007). "Modeling crossing behaviour and accident risk of pedestrians," Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 133, no. 11, pp. 634–644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:11(634)

Downloads

Published

2023-09-28

How to Cite

Nasrudin, N., Khalid, N. S., Abdullah, Y. A., Marzukhi, M. A., & Lim, S. B. (2023). MODEL OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSING BEHAVIOUR BASED ON ROAD TRAFFIC AND HUMAN FACTORS: A CASE STUDY OF MALAYSIA’S SHAH ALAM CITY. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21(29). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i29.1354

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>