THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REGIONAL LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF PURWOREJO REGENCY: THE EVALUATION OF STRATEGIC PLANNING

Authors

  • Murtanti Jani Rahayu Center of Regional Information and Development of LPPM UNS, Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY
  • Aulia Hapsari Juwita Center of Regional Information and Development of LPPM UNS, Development Economics Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY
  • Selfia Bintariningtyas Center of Regional Information and Development of LPPM UNS, Development Economics Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY
  • Erma Fitria Rini Center of Regional Information and Development of LPPM UNS, Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY
  • Tri Wahyuni Center of Regional Information and Development of LPPM UNS, Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i30.1436

Keywords:

government, evaluation, RPJPD, strategic planning

Abstract

The implementation of strategic planning in the public sector is the art of managing government affairs involving the utilization of state power. A set of regional planning in Indonesia is characterized by continuity and interconnectedness within a planning system consisting of the Regional Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPD), the Regional Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD), and the Regional Government Work Plan (RKPD). RPJPD, as part of the national development planning system in Indonesia, is a planning document that guides regional governance for 20 years and delineated into four periods of the RPJMD, each with a validity period of five years. In the planning cycle, the evaluation process is essential to do. The study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the long-term development performance in the public sector in the framework of strategic planning evaluation in Purworejo Regency. The methods employed in the evaluation were cross-sectional and longitudinal qualitative comparative, which involved comparing and correlating the performance achievement of the four periods of the RPJMD conducted at the end of each planning year in the final period. The dominant aspect that supports the achievement of development performance targets is the aspect of government. The inhibiting aspects that hinder the achievement of performance targets in the RPJPD of Purworejo Regency for 2005-2025 are the aspects of economics, infrastructure, socio-culture, and time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abis E and Garau C. (2015). An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Strategic Spatial Planning: A Study of Sardinian Municipalities. European Planning Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1031091

Ahmad, F., Mohd, I., Maidin, S. L., Zainol, R., & Noor, N. M. (2013). Malaysian Development Plan System: Issues and Problems, One Decade after its reform (2001-2011). Planning Malaysia, XI, 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v11i3.105

Ali, W. N. W., & Ahmad, A. G. (2022). A systematic Evaluation Tool For Heritage Shophouse Facades. Planning Malaysia, 20(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i21.1087

Bellamy, R., Lezaun, J., & Palmer, J. (2017). Public perceptions of geoengineering research governance: An experimental deliberative approach. Global Environmental Change, 45(194–202). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.004

Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. C. (2009). Understanding strategic planning and the formulation and implementation of strategic plans as a way of knowing: The contributions of actor-network theory. International Public Management Journal, 12(2), 172–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490902873473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490902873473

Freedman. (2013). Strategy: A History. University Press.

Hamel, G, & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press.

Hamzah, E., Rohaizad, N. F. H. M., Hashim, H. A., & Ismail, A. (2022). Qualifying and Quantifying the Intangible Factors that Enhance in Infrastructure Asset Evaluation. Planning Malaysia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i21.1097

IK Winaya, I. D. Y. (2017). Analisis Perencanaan Dan Penyusunan Anggaran Pendapatan Dan Belanja Desa (Apbdes) Tahun 2017. No Name, 2017, 1–8.

Kaiser et al. (1995). Urban Land Use Planning. In University of Illinois Press: Urbana.

Lim, S., Malek, J. A., Hussain, M. Y., & Tahir, Z. (2019). The Behaviours and Job Positions of Citizens in Smart Cities Development. Planning Malaysia, 133–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v17i10.635

Lukasiewicz, A., Vella, K., Mayere, S., & Baker, D. (2020). Declining trends in plan quality: A longitudinal evaluation of regional environmental plans in Queensland, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103891

Nasution, M. A., & Achmad, N. (2021). Model Evaluasi Perencanaan Pembangunan di Sumatera Development Planning Evaluation Model in North Sumatra. JUPIIS : Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 13(1), 210–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v13i1.23658

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 25 tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2017). Peraturan Menteri dalam Negeri Nomor 86 Tahun 2017 Tentang Tata Cara Perencanaan, Pengendalian dan Evaluasi Pembangunan Daerah, Tata Cara Evaluasi Rancangan Peraturan Daerah Tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Daerah dan Rencana Pembangunan Jangka .

Rider, R. W. (1983). Making strategic planning work in local government. Long Range Planning. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(83)90033-X

Riyadi dan Baratakusumah, D. S. (2008). Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah: Strategi Menggali Potensi dalam Mewujudkan Otonomi Daerah. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Roberts, N. (2000). The Synoptic Model of Strategic Planning and the GPRA: Lacking a Good Fit with the Political Context. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(3), 297. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3380721

Sriharyati, S., & Sholihannisa, L. U. (2020). Evaluasi Perencanaan Pembangunan Kabupaten Bandung Barat dengan Menggunakan Analytic Hierarchy Procces (AHP). ATRABIS: Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 6(1), 59–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38204/atrabis.v6i1.420

Syahroni. (2002). Pengertian Dasar dan Genetik tentang Perencanaan.

Tjokroamidjojo, B. (2002). Pembangunan Desa dan Masalah Kepemimpinannya. Rajawali.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-22

How to Cite

Rahayu, M. J., Juwita, A. H., Bintariningtyas, S., Rini, E. F., & Wahyuni, T. (2024). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REGIONAL LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF PURWOREJO REGENCY: THE EVALUATION OF STRATEGIC PLANNING . PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22(30). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i30.1436