A COMPREHENSIVE BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (1975-2023) ON FACTORS INFLUENCING SAFETY PERFORMANCE IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

Authors

  • Alaa AA Elkaseh Faculty of Civil Engineering, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA, SKUDAI, JOHOR
  • Siti Mazzuana Shamsudin School of Construction and Quantity Surveying, College of Built Environment (CBE), UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
  • Rozana Zakaria Faculty of Artificial Intelligence, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA, KUALA LUMPUR
  • Vikneswaran Munikanan Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY OF MALAYSIA
  • Anees Ahmed Faculty of Civil Engineering, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA, SKUDAI, JOHOR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i31.1474

Keywords:

Bibliometrics, Safety Performance, Citation Analysis, Knowledge Mapping, Safety Factors

Abstract

This extensive bibliometric analysis delves into the dynamic and evolving landscape of research on safety performance factors within the construction industry. This study examines 468 academic articles to monitor the progression of research trends in the construction industry. There is a significant rise in academic endeavours that align with the swift advancements in technology in this domain. Notably, this analysis highlights the pivotal role of influential publication sources as primary repositories of knowledge dissemination. Furthermore, recurring keywords such as “construction industry” and “safety performance” illuminate the multifaceted nature of safety research, emphasising its holistic approach. High-impact works, especially those exploring safety culture and climate, have a strong influence on shaping the discussion and directing industry practices in the field. Academic institutions have also made substantial contributions, actively participating in shaping the conversation on safety performance. Hence, the in-depth analysis offers valuable insights for stakeholders committed to advancing safety practices in the industry, underscoring the sector’s steadfast dedication to fostering safer, more resilient, and socially responsible construction endeavours.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akram, R., Thaheem, M. J., Nasir, A. R., Ali, T. H., & Khan, S. (2019). Exploring the role of building information modeling in construction safety through science mapping. Safety Science, 120(August), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.036

Aksorn, T., & Hadikusumo, B. H. W. (2008). Critical success factors influencing safety program performance in Thai construction projects. Safety Science, 46(4), 709–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.006

Alryalat, S. A. S., Malkawi, L. W., & Momani, S. M. (2019). Comparing bibliometric analysis using pubmed, scopus, and web of science databases. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2019(152). https://doi.org/10.3791/58494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3791/58494-v

Amadeu Dutra Moresi, E., Pinho, I., & Pedro Costa, A. (2021). Bibliometric Analysis: a Quantitative and Qualitative Approach. Proceedings of the 18th CONTECSI International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management, 1(August 2022). https://doi.org/10.5748/18contecsi/pse/lis/6736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5748/18CONTECSI/PSE/LIS/6736

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42, 139–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

Bhagwat, K., & Delhi, V. S. K. (2022). A systematic review of construction safety research: quantitative and qualitative content analysis approach. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 12(2), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-04-2021-0068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-04-2021-0068

Buniya, M. K., Othman, I., Sunindijo, R. Y., Karakhan, A. A., Kineber, A. F., & Durdyev, S. (2023). Contributions of safety critical success factors and safety program elements to overall project success. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 29(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2038419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2022.2038419

Caputo, A., & Kargina, M. (2022). A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 10(1), 82–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-021-00142-7

Chellappa, V., Srivastava, V., & Salve, U. R. (2021). A systematic review of construction workers’ health and safety research in India. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(6), 1488–1504. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-08-2020-0345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-08-2020-0345

Chen, K. (2020). Enhancing construction safety management through edge computing: Framework and scenarios. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 25(25), 438–451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2020.025

Choudhry, R. M., Fang, D., & Mohamed, S. (2007). The nature of safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Safety Science, 45(10), 993–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2006.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2006.09.003

Clarke, S. (2006). The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.315

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(May), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Ensslin, L., & Vianna, W. B. (2008). O design na pesquisa quali-quantitativa em engenharia de produção – questões epistemológicas. Revista Produção Online, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v8i1.28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v8i1.28

Ghaleb, H., Alhajlah, H. H., Bin Abdullah, A. A., Kassem, M. A., & Al-Sharafi, M. A. (2022). A Scientometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review for Construction Project Complexity. Buildings, 12(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040482

Ghosh, D. (2021). Safety Performance Indicators. Safety in Petroleum Industries, November, 163–164. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003129257-5-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003129257-5-5

Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.5.3.347

Guo, H., Yu, Y., & Skitmore, M. (2017). Visualization technology-based construction safety management: A review. Automation in Construction, 73, 135–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.10.004

Haupt, T. C., Akinlolu, M., & Raliile, M. T. (2019). Emerging technologies in construction safety and health management. International Conference on Innovation, Technology, Enterprise, and Entrepreneurship (ICITEE), 413–420.

Jääskeläinen, A., Tappura, S., & Pirhonen, J. (2022a). The path toward successful safety performance measurement. Journal of Safety Research, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.08.014

Jääskeläinen, A., Tappura, S., & Pirhonen, J. (2022b). The path toward successful safety performance measurement. Journal of Safety Research, 83, 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.08.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.08.014

Kaiser, R. (2014). Qualitative experteninterviews. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02479-6

Kazan, E. E. (2013). Analysis of fatal and nonfatal accidents involving earthmoving equipment operators and on-foot workers. Wayne State University.

Kirby, A. (2023). Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a Preliminary Research Tool. Publications, 11(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010010

Knight, C., Patterson, M., & Dawson, J. (2017). Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(6), 792–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2167

Levitt, R. E., & Samelson, N. M. (1993). Construction safety management. john wiley & sons.

Liang, H., Zhang, S., & Su, Y. (2020). The structure and emerging trends of construction safety management research: a bibliometric review. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 26(3), 469–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1444565

Machfudiyanto, R. A., Latief, Y., & Indah, Y. (2021). Interrelation between policies and safety culture on safety performance and project performance in the construction sector. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 794(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012028

Machfudiyanto, R. A., Latief, Y., & Robert. (2019a). Critical Success Factors to Improve Safety Culture on Construction Project in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 258(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/258/1/012016

Machfudiyanto, R. A., Latief, Y., & Robert. (2019b). Critical Success Factors to Improve Safety Culture on Construction Project in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 258(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/258/1/012016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/258/1/012016

Malakoutikhah, M., Alimohammadlou, M., Rabiei, H., Faghihi, S. A., Kamalinia, M., & Jahangiri, M. (2022). A scientometric study of unsafe behavior through Web of Science during 1991–2020. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28(4), 2033–2045. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1953787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1953787

Nævestad, T. O., Hesjevoll, I. S., & Phillips, R. O. (2018). How can we improve safety culture in transport organizations? A review of interventions, effects and influencing factors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.002

Newaz, M. T., Ershadi, M., Jefferies, M., Pillay, M., & Davis, P. (2023). A systematic review of contemporary safety management research: A multi-level approach to identifying trending domains in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 41(2), 97–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2124527

Ninkov, A., Frank, J. R., & Maggio, L. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on Medical Education, 11(3), 173–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-021-00695-4

Park, C.-S., & Kim, H.-J. (2013). A framework for construction safety management and visualization system. Automation in Construction, 33, 95–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.012

Safety Management International Collaboration Group. (2013). Measuring Safety Performance Guidelines for Service Providers.

Shah, S. H. H., Lei, S., Ali, M., Doronin, D., & Hussain, S. T. (2020). Prosumption: bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes, 49(3), 1020–1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2018-0696

Siu, O. L., Phillips, D. R., & Leung, T. wing. (2004). Safety climate and safety performance among construction workers in Hong Kong: The role of psychological strains as mediators. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(3), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00016-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00016-2

Sultana, S., Andersen, B. S., & Haugen, S. (2019). Identifying safety indicators for safety performance measurement using a system engineering approach. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 128, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.05.047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.05.047

Tao, J., Yang, F., Qiu, D., & Reniers, G. (2020). Analysis of safety leadership using a science mapping approach. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 140, 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.031

Tezel, A., Dobrucali, E., Demirkesen, S., & Kiral, I. A. (2021). Critical success factors for safety training in the construction industry. Buildings, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040139

Wang, Q., Curcuruto, M., Mei, Q., Liu, S., Zhou, Q., & Zhang, J. (2019). Agent-based modeling of employee protection-oriented safety proactivity behaviors at small scale enterprises. BioMed Research International, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2471418

Xie, L., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Zheng, C., & Jiang, J. (2020). Bibliometric and visualized analysis of scientific publications on atlantoaxial spine surgery based on Web of Science and VOSviewer. World Neurosurgery, 137, 435–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.171

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Elkaseh, A. A., Shamsudin, S. M., Zakaria, R., Munikanan, V., & Ahmed, A. (2024). A COMPREHENSIVE BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (1975-2023) ON FACTORS INFLUENCING SAFETY PERFORMANCE IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22(31). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i31.1474

Most read articles by the same author(s)