AN ASSESSMENT ON THE IMPACT OF PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT OF PERHENTIAN ISLAND, TERENGGANU, MALAYSIA TOWARD THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF ITS RESIDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i31.1480Keywords:
Island Development, Perhentian Island, Quality of LifeAbstract
Development is important to increase residents' Quality of Life (QaL). The development of Perhentian island is far behind the development of other mainland towns and cities in Terengganu which has significantly affected the Quality of Life (QoL) of its residents. Therefore, a proper study on the benefits and strategies of developing an island has to be conducted to fulfil the needs of the island’s residents. This research aims to investigate the development of Perhentian Island, Terengganu. The research used a quantitative methodology utilising an observation checklist as its instrument. The checklist comprises 23 elements which are housing area, education facilities, health facilities, entertainment facilities, safety facilities, office buildings, industrial sector, energy resources, water resources, restaurants, hotels, transportation, road, grocery store, scenery, conservation centre, jetty, waste management, drainage system, food resource, network and coverage, worship buildings, and buildings organization. The data collected from the observation were presented in Excel tabulated format with identification of strongly dissatisfied, satisfied, neutral, satisfied, and strongly satisfied. Overall, the findings of this study show that the development on Perhentian Island is at neutral level. It is hoped that the study outcome can provide guidelines for Perhentian Island's future development toward achieving a better Quality of Life for its residents.
Downloads
References
Aizat S (2019) Retrieved from : https://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/penduduk-pulau-perhentian-harap-pembangunan-tidak-sekadar-bermusim-18634
Bukenya, J. O., Gebremedhin, T. G., & Schaeffer, P. V. (2003). Analysis of Quality of Life and Rural Development: Evidence from West Virginia Data. Growth and Change, 34(2), 202–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2257.00214
Craglia, Max & Leontidou, Lila & Nuvolati, Giampaolo & Jürgen, Schweikart. (2004). Towards the Development of Quality of Life Indicators in the ‘Digital’ City. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31. 51-64. 10.1068/b12918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b12918
Dang, Y., Chen, L., Zhang, W., Zheng, D., & Zhan, D. (2020). How does growing city size affect residents’ happiness in urban China? A case study of the Bohai rim area. Habitat International, 102120. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102120
Ghani, N. A., Yassin, S. M., Ahmad, W. I. W., & Abdullah, W. S. W. (2011). The quality of life (QOL) of the island people in the state of Terengganu, Malaysia: A Study on Pulau Redang and Pulau Perhentian. Canadian Social Science, 7(3), 59-70.
Gibbs, R. (2005). Education as a rural development strategy (No. 1490-2016-127953, pp. 20-25).
Grant, A. M., Christianson, M. K., & Price, R. H. (2007). Happiness, Health, or Relationships? Managerial Practices and Employee Well-Being Tradeoffs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 51–63. doi:10.5465/amp.2007.26421238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.26421238
Haggblade, S., Hazell, P., & Reardon, T. (2010). The Rural Non-farm Economy: Prospects for Growth and Poverty Reduction. World Development, 38(10), 1429– 1441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.008
Hassan, N., Mohd Jaafar, N. I., Raja Ariffin, R. N., Abu Samah, A., & Jaafar, M. N. (2013). Perceptions on Quality of Life in Malaysia: The Urban-Rural Divide. Planning Malaysia, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v11i3.106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v11.i3.106
Harry J., (2022) Rural road network must be improved to boost rural economy. Retrieved from https://pngnri.org/index.php/blog/183-rural-road-network-must-be-improved-to-boost-ruraleconomy
Herzog, H. (2011). The Impact of Pets on Human Health and Psychological Well-Being: Fact, Fiction, or Hypothesis? Current Directions in Psychological Science - CURR DIRECTIONS PSYCHOL SCI. 20. 236-239. 10.1177/0963721411415220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411415220
Hettige, H. (2006). When do rural roads benefit the poor and how?: an in-depth analysis based on case studies. Asian Development Bank.
Mohamad, M., Yusof, B. M., Mohammad, M., & Ali, A. M. (2008). Modeling Spirituality, Wellness and Quality of Life: A Study in Redang and Perhentian Islands. 2008 Second Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation (AMS). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/AMS.2008.198
Moser, A., Peter, H., Fengler, B., & Strohm-Lömpcke, R. (2018). Improving the quality of life with rural development programs in Germany (2007–2013): Evidence from the Evaluation. European Countryside, 10(2), 321-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-0019
Muhibudin, M., & Mohamed, B. (2014). An Assessment on Destination Characteristics: The Case Study of Pulau Perhentian. SHS Web of Conferences. 12. 10.1051/shsconf/20141201095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20141201095
Okumus, B. (2020). Food tourism research: a perspective article. Tourism Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-11-2019-0450
Othman, A. G., & Hj. Ali, K. (2020). Transportation And Quality of Life. Planning Malaysia, 18(13). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i13.774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i13.774
Ramdas, M & Mohamed, B. (2014). Impacts of Tourism on Environmental Attributes, Environmental Literacy and Willingness to Pay: A Conceptual and Theoretical Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 144. 378–391. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.307
Swaffield, S. R., Corry, R. C., Opdam, P., McWilliam, W., & Primdahl, J. (2019). Connecting business with the agricultural landscape: business strategies for sustainable rural development. Business Strategy and the Environment. doi:10.1002/bse.2320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2320
Swanwick, C. (2009). Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy, 26, 62–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.025
Wonderful Malaysia (2019) Retrieved from https://www.wonderfulmalaysia.com/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.