ADOPTION OF SOCIAL COST AMONG STAKEHOLDERS IN MALAYSIA CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

Authors

  • Tantish Kamaruddin Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment & Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Thee Chai Shan Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment & Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Nurshikin Mohamad Shukery Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment & Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Fara Diva Mustapa Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment & Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Mohamad Zahierruden Ismail Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment & Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i32.1494

Keywords:

Economic, Social Costs, Quantitative Method

Abstract

Social costs are the overall impact of economic activity on the welfare of society. Social costs are the 'invisible' components of building operations, hence are not included in the tender price. However, the people of a nearby construction zone pay the price by enduring disturbed economic activity, pollution, and disrupted health and social well-being; without any adequate compensation. The purpose of this study is to identify the level of understanding of social cost among construction players and to identify the level of importance of social cost consideration among construction players. This research will provide new information for predicting or assuming the link between the level of understanding and level of importance among construction stakeholders. According to the literature, social cost indicators as a result of construction-related negative impacts for construction players include transportation, economic activities, and social, ecological, and health systems. The respondents for this research were conducted among clients, contractors, architects, engineers, and quantity surveyor firms. A quantitative method using questionnaires is applied to obtain data. In terms of social cost understanding, the data shows that different types of construction stakeholders have varying levels of understanding. According to the findings of the study by mean, the level of understanding of social costs for most respondents is road safety problems, followed by construction site water pollution causing irreversible damages. Then, the third highest mean score which is the air pollution of construction machinery produces air emissions that contain carbon and nitrogen oxides, toxic substances, and heavy metals. The finding emphasises that the level of understanding and the level of importance of social costs consideration among construction players are aware that road safety problems are the main reason for missing construction projects. Meanwhile, there is no significant relationship between the level of understanding and the level of importance of social costs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd-Mutalib, H., Intan, T. P., Yahya, N. H., Hasan, S., Sultan, P., & Mu’adzam Shah, A. H. (2020). Green Commitment for Sustainability: Environmental Disclosure in A Malaysian Public Listed Construction Firm. In Journal on Technical (Vol. 5, Issue 1). http://upikpolimas.edu.my/ojs/

Aizuddin, A., Rami, M., Ibrahim, A., Ismail, I. A., Nazuri, N. S., Olaitan, A. A., & Nazuri, S. (2023). Planning for Community Development: Effect of Knowledge Management, Social Capital, and Community Leadership. Planning, Malaysia, 21, 185–197. https://www.planningmalaysia.org/index.php/pmj/article/view/1395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i30.1395

Alabi, A. T., Musibau, & Jelili, O. (2023). Clarifying Likert Scale Misconceptions for Improved Application in Urban Studies. 57, 1337–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01415-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01415-8

Ariff, M., Daud, M., Rosly, S. A., & Sori, Z. M. (2023). Determinants of Investment to Attract Investment in Affordable Housing in Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 21. https://www.planningmalaysia.org/index.php/pmj/article/view/1402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i30.1402

Balaban, O. (2012). The Negative Effects of Construction Boom on Urban Planning and Environment In Turkey: Unraveling The Role Of The Public Sector. Habitat International, 36(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Habitatint.2011.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.05.003

Bartholomew, S. H. (2022). Construction Contracting Business and Legal Principles. Introduction to Process Plant Projects, 403.

Behm, M. (2008). Construction Sector. Journal of Safety Research, 39(2), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2008.02.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2008.02.007

Bertram, D. (2007). Likert Scales …are the Meaning of Life. http://www.performancezoom.com/performanceszoom_fichiers/likert.gif

Budayan, C., & Celik, T. (2021). Determination of Important Building Construction Adverse Impacts Creating Nuisances in Residential Areas on Neighbouring Community. Teknik Dergi, 32(2), 10611–10628. https://doi.org/10.18400/TEKDERG.486628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18400/tekderg.486628

Çelik, T., Arayici, Y., & Budayan, C. (2019). Assessing the social cost of housing projects on the built environment: Analysis and monetization of the adverse impacts incurred on the neighbouring communities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 77, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIAR.2019.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.03.001

Çelik, T., Kamali, S., & Arayici, Y. (2017). Social cost in construction projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 64, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIAR.2017.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.03.001

Danku, J. C., Adjei-Kumi, T., Kofi Baiden, B., & Agyekum, K. (2020). An Exploratory Study into Social Cost Considerations in Ghanaian Construction Industry. Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, 8, 14–29. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbcprt.2020.81002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jbcpr.2020.81002

Durdyev, S., Omarov, M., & Ismail, S. (2020). SWOT Analysis of the Cambodian Construction Industry Within the ASEAN Economic Community. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3044347

Enshassi, A., Kochendoerfer, B., & Al Ghoul, H. (2016). Factors affecting sustainable performance of construction projects during project life cycle phases. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 7.

Gilchrist, A., & Allouche, E. N. (2005). Quantification of social costs associated with construction projects: state-of-the-art review. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 20(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TUST.2004.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2004.04.003

Ijigah, E. A., Jimoh, R. A., Aruleba, B. O., & Bilau, A. A. (2013). An Assessment of Environmental Impacts of Building Construction Projects. 3(1). http://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10629

Johnston, A., Amaeshi, · Kenneth, Adegbite, E., & Osuji, O. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility as Obligated Internalisation of Social Costs. Journal of Business Ethics, 170, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04329-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04329-y

Margorínová, M., & Trojanová, M. (2019). Social costs of the road project in the operation phase. Transportation Research Procedia, 40, 1103–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRPRO.2019.07.154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.154

Matthews, J. C. (2010). A Social Cost Calculator for Utility Construction Projects. North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268416182

Onubi, H. O., Yusof, N. A., & Hassan, A. S. (2020). Understanding the mechanism through which adoption of green construction site practices impacts economic performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120170

Ramírez, G. P. M., Byliński, H., & Niedostatkiewicz, M. (2021). Deterioration and protection of concrete elements embedded in contaminated soil: A review. Materials, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123253

Saito, L. T. (2012). How Low-Income Residents Can Benefit from Urban Development: The LA Live Community Benefits Agreement. City and Community, 11(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-6040.2012.01399.X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2012.01399.x

Vanier, D., Profile, S., & Rahman, S. (2004). MIIP Report: Survey on Municipal Infrastructure Assets. https://doi.org/10.4224/20377194

Waddington, D. C., Woodcock, J., Peris, E., Condie, J., Sica, G., Moorhouse, A. T., & Steele, A. (2014). Human Response to Vibration in Residential Environments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(1), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4836496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4836496

Yan, Y. J., Hao, H. N., & Yam, L. H. (2004). Vibration-based construction and extraction of structural damage feature index. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 41(24–25), 6661–6676. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2004.05.069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.05.069

Yu, H.-J., Han, K.-Y., Kwak, K.-S., Kim, J.-S., & Yang, K.-Y. (2004). A Study on the Actual Condition and Effect of Dust Scattering in Construction Field. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 4(4), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.5345/jkic.2004.4.4.109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2004.4.4.109

Yu, W.-D., & Lo, S.-S. (2007). Construction Management and Economics Time-Dependent Construction Social Costs Model Time-Dependent Construction Social Costs Model. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500040281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500040281

Downloads

Published

2024-07-29

How to Cite

Kamaruddin, T., Shan, T. C., Mohamad Shukery, N., Mustapa, F. D., & Ismail, M. Z. (2024). ADOPTION OF SOCIAL COST AMONG STAKEHOLDERS IN MALAYSIA CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22(32). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i32.1494

Most read articles by the same author(s)