EXPLORING AFFORDANCES IN CHILD-FRIENDLY URBAN GREEN SPACES: IMPACTS ON ACTIVITY PATTERNS AND DEVELOPMENTAL NEEDS

Authors

  • Yunlong Niu Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR, 50603, MALAYSIA
  • Hazreena Hussein Centre for Sustainable Urban Planning and Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR, 50603, MALAYSIA
  • Mastura Adam Centre for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment UNIVERSITI MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR, 50603, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1805

Keywords:

Affordance, Behavioural Mapping, Children’s Behaviour, Urban Green Spaces

Abstract

Child-friendly urban green spaces (UGS) are outdoor environments that offer diverse opportunities for play and support children’s holistic development. From an ecological perspective, these spaces provide rich affordances that encourage autonomous exploration and interaction. However, planning and design remain predominantly adult-driven, often resulting in a misalignment between the affordances available and those perceived or used by children. This study investigates how different types of affordances in UGS shape children’s activity patterns and behaviours. Using behavioural mapping in three distinct UGS settings, the research systematically examines the relationship between children’s activity preferences and environmental attributes. Findings show that children actively explore their surroundings, discovering actual affordances while gradually recognising potential ones and transforming them into new utilisable opportunities. Their needs for environmental attributes vary, and they adjust their engagement by balancing support and challenge in line with ability levels and developmental goals. These dynamics highlight the critical role of affordance-rich UGS in fostering children’s adaptive development and underscore the importance of designing spaces that align with children’s perspectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altman, I. (2012). Children and the Environment. Springer Science & Business Media.

Aminpour, F. (2021). The physical characteristics of children’s preferred natural settings in Australian primary school grounds. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 62, 127163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127163

Bao, Y., Gao, M., Luo, D., & Zhou, X. (2023). Urban Parks—A Catalyst for Activities! The Effect of the Perceived Characteristics of the Urban Park Environment on Children’s Physical Activity Levels. Forests, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020423

Barrable, A., Booth, D., Adams, D., & Beauchamp, G. (2021). Enhancing Nature Connection and Positive Affect in Children through Mindful Engagement with Natural Environments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094785

Beery, T., & Jørgensen, K. A. (2018). Children in Nature: Sensory Engagement and the Experience of Biodiversity. Environmental Education Research, 24(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1250149

Bergen, D. (2021). The Handbook of Developmentally Appropriate Toys. Rowman & Littlefield.

Blennerhassett, J. M., Borschmann, K. N., Lipson-Smith, R. A., & Bernhardt, J. (2018). Behavioral Mapping of Patient Activity to Explore the Built Environment During Rehabilitation. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11(3), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586718758444

Cheuk, F. (2016). Behavioral Mapping and Tracking. In Research Methods for Environmental Psychology (pp. 29–51). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119162124.ch3

Cordero-Vinueza, V. A., Niekerk, F. (Femke), & van Dijk, T. (Terry). (2023). Making child-friendly cities: A socio-spatial literature review. Cities, 137, 104248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104248

Dinkel, D., Snyder, K., Patterson, T., Warehime, S., Kuhn, M., & Wisneski, D. (2019). An Exploration of Infant and Toddler Unstructured Outdoor Play. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 27(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2019.1579550

El-Kholy, S. A., Moustafa, Y. M., & Abou El-Ela, M. A. S. (2022). Urban Park Design and Children’s Physical Activity Levels: An Investigation of Design Characteristics of Green Areas and Playgrounds. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 69(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-022-00152-x

Fajrie, N., Kartika, D., Utaminingsih, S., & Santoso, D. (2024). Natural Material-Based Art Learning Model Increases Aesthetic Experiences in Early Childhood. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha, 12, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.23887/paud.v12i1.74612

Gibson, J. (1983). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Revised ed. edition). Praeger.

Guo, D., Shi, Y., & Chen, R. (2022). Environmental Affordances and Children’s Needs: Insights from Child-Friendly Community Streets in China. Frontiers of Architectural Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2022.11.003

Holland, J. L. (1997). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (pp. xiv, 303). Psychological Assessment Resources.

Hussein, H. (2009). Therapeutic Intervention: Using Sensory Gardens to Enhance the Quality of Life for Children with Special Needs [University of Edinburgh]. https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/34712

Islam, M. Z., Moore, R., & Cosco, N. (2016). Child-Friendly, Active, Healthy Neighborhoods: Physical Characteristics and Children’s Time Outdoors. Environment and Behavior, 48(5), 711–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514554694

Jansson, M., Herbert, E., Zalar, A., & Johansson, M. (2022). Child-Friendly Environments—What, How and by Whom? Sustainability, 14(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084852

Kusumo Dewi, D. I., Rakhmatulloh, A. R., & Amadea, D. (2020). Indicators of Open Space Quality for Children in High- Density Settlements. Planning Malaysia, 18(11). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i11.718

Kyttä, M. (2002). Affordances of Children’s Environments in the Context of Cities, Small Towns, Suburbs and Rural Villages in Finland and Belarus. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0249

Kyttä, M. (2004). The Extent of Children’s Independent Mobility and the Number of Actualized Affordances as Criteria for Child-Friendly Environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00073-2

Lanza, K., Alcazar, M., Hoelscher, D. M., & Kohl, H. W. (2021). Effects of Trees, Gardens, and Nature Trails on Heat Index and Child Health: Design and Methods of the Green Schoolyards Project. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10128-2

Leung, G. Y. S., Hazan, H., & Chan, C. S. (2022). Exposure to nature in immersive virtual reality increases connectedness to nature among people with low nature affinity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 83, 101863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101863

Li, H., Browning, M. H. E. M., Cao, Y., & Zhang, G. (2022). From Childhood Residential Green space to Adult Mental Wellbeing: A Pathway Analysis among Chinese Adults. Behavioral Sciences, 12(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12030084

Masarik, A. S., & Conger, R. D. (2017). Stress and child development: A review of the Family Stress Model. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.008

Melson, G. F., Fine, A. H., & VonLintel, J. F. (2025). Animals in the Lives of Children. In A. H. Fine, M. K. Mueller, Z. Y. Ng, T. C. Griffin, & P. Tedeschi (Eds.), Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy (Sixth Edition) (pp. 301–322). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-22346-4.15005-X

Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China. (2017). Standard for Classification of Urban Green Space of China (No. (CJJ/T85-2017)). Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the Peopele’s Repubilc of China. https://www.mohurd.gov.cn/

Mustapa, N. D., Maliki, N. Z., & Hamzah, A. (2020). Assessing Children’s Connectedness to Nature Through Their Interest in Natural Elements. Planning Malaysia, 18. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i13.783

Onojeghuo, A. R., Nykiforuk, C. I. J., Belon, A. P., & Hewes, J. (2019). Behavioral Mapping of Children’s Physical Activities and Social Behaviors in an Indoor Preschool Facility: Methodological Challenges in Revealing the Influence of Space in Play. International Journal of Health Geographics, 18(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-019-0191-y

Parrott, H. M., & Cohen, L. E. (2020). Advocating for Play: The Benefits of Unstructured Play in Public Schools. School Community Journal, 30(2), 229–254.

Perry, M. A., Devan, H., Fitzgerald, H., Han, K., Liu, L.-T., & Rouse, J. (2018). Accessibility and Usability of Parks and Playgrounds. Disability and Health Journal, 11(2), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.08.011

Romero-Ternero, M. C., García-Robles, R., Cagigas-Muñiz, D., Rivera-Romero, O., & Romero-Ternero, M. J. (2022). Participant Observation to Apply an Empirical Method of Codesign with Children. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2022, e1101847. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1101847

Slingerland, G., Lukosch, S., & Brazier, F. (2020). Engaging Children to Co-create Outdoor Play Activities for Place-making. Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385017

Soga, M., Gaston, K. J., Yamaura, Y., Kurisu, K., & Hanaki, K. (2016). Both Direct and Vicarious Experiences of Nature Affect Children’s Willingness to Conserve Biodiversity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13060529

Song, C., Ikei, H., & Miyazaki, Y. (2018). Physiological Effects of Visual Stimulation with Forest Imagery. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020213

Tandon, P. S., Kroshus, E., Olsen, K., Garrett, K., Qu, P., & McCleery, J. (2021). Socioeconomic Inequities in Youth Participation in Physical Activity and Sports. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136946

Tang, P., Yang, D., & Dong, N. (2023). The Effect of Intergenerational Parenting Mode on Children’s Outdoor Activities: A Case Study of Downtown Shanghai Communities. Sustainability, 15(20), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014658

Taylor, R. B., Haberman, C. P., & Groff, E. R. (2019). Urban park crime: Neighborhood context and park features. Journal of Criminal Justice, 64, 101622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.101622

Vidal, D. G., & Castro, E. (2022). Children’s Green Infrastructure: Children and Their Rights to Nature and the City. Frontiers in Sociology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.804535

Zhao, T., Phanthabutr, S., พันธบุตร, เ., University, S., Phanthabutr, S., พันธบุตร, เ., saowaluck@swu.ac.th, & saowaluck@swu.ac.th. (2023). Landscape Design of Future City Community Public Spacein Tianjin Post-Covid-19. http://ir-ithesis.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/2677

Downloads

Published

2025-10-16

How to Cite

Niu, Y., Hussein, H., & Adam, M. (2025). EXPLORING AFFORDANCES IN CHILD-FRIENDLY URBAN GREEN SPACES: IMPACTS ON ACTIVITY PATTERNS AND DEVELOPMENTAL NEEDS. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 23(38). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1805

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>