AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN PERCEIVING CAMPUS LEGIBILITY THROUGH COGNITIVE MAPPING

Authors

  • Mastura Adam Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA
  • Kishen Naidu Subramaniam Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA
  • Norafida Ab Ghafar Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA
  • Najah Md Alwi Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA
  • Ziad Baydoun Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1811

Keywords:

Imageability, Mental mapping, Legibility, Campus Image and Identity

Abstract

University campuses rely on imageability and legibility to support navigation and identity, yet complex layouts can undermine orientation and student experience. This study examines campus imageability at Universiti Malaya using a mixed-methods design: a questionnaire (n=50), cognitive mapping tasks grounded in Lynch’s five elements, and semi-structured interviews (n=10). Descriptive and thematic analyses assessed wayfinding challenges, the salience of spatial elements, and perceived identity. Results show landmarks (e.g., Dewan Tunku Canselor, UM Library) and edges (notably Varsity Lake) dominate mental maps, while ambiguous intersections, inconsistent signage, and long, indirect pathways contribute to navigation friction. Pathways such as Jalan Lingkungan Budi anchor movement but nodes and districts are recalled less reliably. The findings indicate that a small set of highly imageable elements carries most of the cognitive load for wayfinding and belonging. We recommend (i) targeted signage and pathway reinforcement, (ii) coherent zoning into named “districts,” and (iii) incremental adoption of digital/AR guides for first-time users. Enhancing legibility can strengthen campus identity and improve everyday student experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appleyard, D. (1970). Styles and methods of structuring a city. Environment and Behavior, 2(1), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657000200106

Askarizad, R., & He, J. (2022). Perception of spatial legibility and its association with human mobility patterns: An empirical assessment of the historical districts in Rasht, Iran. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215258

Bhatia, S., Chalup, S. K., & Ostwald, M. J. (2013). Wayfinding: A method for the empirical evaluation of structural saliency using 3D isovists. Architectural Science Review, 56(3), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2013.811635

Blades, M. (1990). The reliability of data collected from sketch maps. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80032-5

Cullen, G. (1961). The concise townscape. Architectural Press.

Deniz, K., & Topcu, M. (2012). Visual presentation of mental images in urban design education: Cognitive maps. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.208

Esfandfard, E., Wahab, M. H., & Che Amat, R. (2018). Universal Design in Urban Public Spaces for People With Disability. Case Study of Tehran, Iran. Planning Malaysia, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i5.421

Erfani, G. (2022). Reconceptualizing sense of place: Towards a conceptual framework for investigating individual-community-place interrelationships. Journal of Planning Literature, 37(3), 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221081109

Eshruq Labin, A. M. J. (2020). The relation between way-finding and built environment legibility: Effects of architectural design elements on spatial behavior. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.30845/ijhss.v10n2a6

Guelton, B. (2023). “Mental maps”: Between memorial transcription and symbolic projection. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1142238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1142238

Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0221

Irfan, A., & Sulaiman, A. R. Z. (2020). Student’s perceived university image is an antecedent of university reputation. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 650–663. https://doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i1/pr200170

Lai, K. T., & Ujang, N. (2012). The application of mental mapping technique in identifying the legible elements within historical district of Kuala Lumpur city centre. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 113–123.

Latypova, M., Mingalimova, E., Rubtsova, A., & Tazov, A. (2021). Empirical study of the mental representation of the image of the city. E3S Web of Conferences, 274, 01034. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401034

Lopez, A., & Bosco, A. (2022). Distortions in spatial mental representation affect sketch maps in young adults. Neurology International, 14(4), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint14040064

Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.

Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.

Norberg-Schulz, C. (2019). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture (1979). Historic Cities: Issues in Urban Conservation, 8, 31.

Relph, E. (1978). Place and placelessness. Pion. https://doi.org/10.2307/213523

Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 441–488). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Swobodzinski, M., Parker, A. T., Wright, J. D., Hansen, K., & Morton, B. (2021). Seamless wayfinding by a deafblind adult on an urban college campus: A case study on wayfinding performance, information preferences, and technology requirements. Frontiers in Education, 6, 723098. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.723098

Tan, K. T., & Ujang, N. (2014). Place attachment and the value of place in the life of the users. Planning Malaysia, 12, 1–16

Turk, Y. A., Sena, B., & Ozyavuz, A. (2015). Students’ exploration on campus legibility. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.144

Vecco, M. (2020). Genius loci as a meta-concept. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 41, 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.07.001

Weisman, J. (1981). Evaluating architectural legibility. Environment and Behavior, 13(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581132004

Zacharias, J. (1997). The impact of layout and visual stimuli on the itineraries and perceptions of pedestrians in a public market. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1068/b240023

Zhang, Z., Fisher, T., & Wan, H. (2024). Campus environmental quality and streetscape features related to walking activity. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 23(1), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2220780

Downloads

Published

2025-10-16

How to Cite

Adam, M., Subramaniam, K. N., Ab Ghafar, N., Md Alwi, N., & Baydoun, Z. (2025). AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN PERCEIVING CAMPUS LEGIBILITY THROUGH COGNITIVE MAPPING. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 23(38). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1811

Issue

Vol. 23 (2025): PLANNING MALAYSIA JOURNAL : Volume 23, Issue 4, 2025

Section

Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.

Copyright & Creative Commons Licence

eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>