EXPLORING PEDESTRIAN NETWORK CONNECTIVITY THROUGH SPACE SYNTAX

Authors

  • Quraishia Abd Rashid Postgraduate Studies, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA SHAH ALAM
  • Marina Mohd Nor Studies of Town and Regional Planning, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA PUNCAK ALAM
  • Na’asah Nasrudin Studies of Town and Regional Planning, College of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA PUNCAK ALAM
  • Nur Aulia Rosni Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1874

Keywords:

pedestrian, space syntax, axial analysis, connectivity, pedestrian movement

Abstract

The quality of the pedestrian environment is influenced by factors such as safety, comfort, attractiveness, and accessibility, collectively referred to as walkability. Walkability encompasses both the physical infrastructure and the social and cultural dimensions of walking. This study evaluates pedestrian network connectivity along three primary routes, namely Persiaran Bestari, Jalan Plumbum, and Persiaran Permai, using the space syntax approach with an axial map. The axial map, derived from Open Street Map (OSM) and supplemented with site inventory data, represents spatial connectivity through axial lines that illustrate relationships between spaces within the network. Integrating primary and secondary data facilitated a comprehensive assessment of pedestrian volume and spatial configuration. The findings indicate that Persiaran Bestari records the highest pedestrian volume, attributed to its proximity to schools and residential areas that sustain continuous foot traffic. Axial analysis further demonstrates that Persiaran Bestari and Persiaran Permai possess the highest levels of connectivity, particularly in zones characterised by dense residential and commercial land use. This study highlights the correlation between infrastructure, facilities, and land-use zoning, offering valuable insights for urban planners and policymakers seeking to design walkable cities that prioritise connectivity, accessibility, and social interaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bıyık, C. (2019). Smart cities in Turkey: Approaches, advances and applications with greater consideration for future urban transport development. Energies, 12(12), 2308. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12122308

Cambra, P., & Moura, F. (2020). How does walkability change relate to walking behavior change? Effects of a street improvement in pedestrian volumes and walking experience. Journal of Transport & Health, 16, 100797.

Ewing, R., Hajrasouliha, A., Neckerman, K. M., Purciel-Hill, M., & Greene, W. (2016). Streetscape features related to pedestrian activity. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(1), 5–15.

Fan, M., Hedayati Marzbali, M., Abdullah, A., & Maghsoodi Tilaki, M. J. (2024). Using a space syntax approach to enhance pedestrians’ accessibility and safety in the historic city of George Town, Penang. Urban Science, 8(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8010006

Ferrer, S., & Ruiz, T. (2018). The impact of the built environment on the decision to walk for short trips: Evidence from two Spanish cities. Transport Policy, 67, 111–120.

Fonseca, F., Fernandes, E., & Ramos, R. (2022). Walkable cities: Using the smart pedestrian net method for evaluating a pedestrian network in Guimarães, Portugal. Sustainability, 14(16), 10306. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610306

Forsyth, A., & Southworth, M. (2008). Cities afoot – pedestrians, walkability and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), 1–3.

Galderisi, A., & Ceudech, A. (2010). Soft mobility and pedestrian networks in urban areas. TeMA Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 2 (Selected Papers 2009), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/119

Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for people. Island Press.

Hacar, Ö. Ö., Gülgen, F., & Bilgi, S. (2020). Evaluation of the space syntax measures affecting pedestrian density through ordinal logistic regression analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(10), 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9100589

Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge University Press.

Iliyasu, I. I., Abdullah, A., & Marzbali, M. H. (2023). Residential environment and burglary crime risk: A space syntax analysis of crime areas. Planning Malaysia, 21(28). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i28.1347

Jabbari, M., Fonseca, F., & Ramos, R. (2018). Combining multi-criteria and space syntax analysis to assess a pedestrian network: The case of Oporto. Journal of Urban Design, 23(1), 23–41.

Karwand, Z., Mokhtar, S., Hustim, M., & Shimizu, T. (2024). Evaluating pedestrian crossing attributes at intersections in Kabul city, Afghanistan: A computer vision approach. Planning Malaysia, 22(33). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i33.1545

Khalid, N. S., Othman, R. N. R., & Marzukhi, M. A. (2020). Public spaces and gender: Testing the relationship of spatial configuration of street networks. Planning Malaysia, 18.

Lee, S., Yoo, C., & Seo, K. W. (2020). Determinant factors of pedestrian volume in different land-use zones: Combining space syntax metrics with GIS-based built-environment measures. Sustainability, 12(20), 8647.

Lerman, Y., Rofè, Y., & Omer, I. (2014). Using space syntax to model pedestrian movement in urban transportation planning. Geographical Analysis, 46(4), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12063

Litman, T. (2024). Cool walkability planning. Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org/cwi.pdf

Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.

Mehta, V. (2008). Walkable streets: Pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1(3), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170802529480

Monokrousou, K., & Giannopoulou, M. (2016). Interpreting and predicting pedestrian movement in public space through space syntax analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 509–514.

Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418

Nag, D., Sen, J., & Goswami, A. K. (2022). Measuring connectivity of pedestrian street networks in the built environment for walking: A space-syntax approach. Transportation in Developing Economies, 8(2), 34.

Navastara, A. M., Yusuf, M., & Navitas, P. (2018, November). Application of space syntax method to measure spatial connectivity in campus of Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS). In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 202, No. 1, p. 012015). IOP Publishing.

Özbek, M. Ö., Ertürk, F., Çelebi, T. T., Kınacı, Y., & Caymaz, G. F. Y. (2022). Interpretations and comparisons of pedestrian movement and land use activities in Kadıköy region using space syntax method. SAUC - Street Art and Urban Creativity, 8(1), 48–61.

Papadimitriou, E., Yannis, G., & Golias, J. (2009). A critical assessment of pedestrian behaviour models. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(3), 242–255.

Quednau, R. (2018). Why walkable streets are more economically productive. Strong Towns Article.

Rankavat, S., & Tiwari, G. (2016). Pedestrians perceptions for utilization of pedestrian facilities – Delhi, India. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 495–499.

Rashid, Q., Zhang, A., & Nor, M. M. (2024). Pedestrian priorities.

Sharmin, S., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2017). Meta-analysis of the relationships between space syntax measures and pedestrian movement. Transport Reviews, 38(4), 524–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1365101

Tibbalds, F. (2012). Making people-friendly towns: Improving the public environment in towns and cities. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469521

Yang, C., & Qian, Z. (2023). Street network or functional attractors? Capturing pedestrian movement patterns and urban form with the integration of space syntax and MCDA. Urban Design International, 28(1), 3–18.

Yıldırım, Ö. C., & Çelik, E. (2023). Understanding pedestrian behavior and spatial relations: A pedestrianized area in Besiktas, Istanbul. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2022.06.009

Downloads

Published

2025-11-26

How to Cite

Abd Rashid , Q., Mohd Nor , M., Nasrudin, N., & Rosni, N. A. (2025). EXPLORING PEDESTRIAN NETWORK CONNECTIVITY THROUGH SPACE SYNTAX. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 23(38). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1874

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3