REVIVING LOST SPACES BENEATH ELEVATED RAIL LINES IN URBAN AREAS

Authors

  • Farah Adiba Karim School of Town Planning & Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) SHAH ALAM
  • Yusfida Ayu Abdullah School of Town Planning & Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) SHAH ALAM
  • Hamizah Yakob School of Town Planning & Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) SHAH ALAM
  • Raja Norashekin Raja Othman School of Town Planning & Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) SHAH ALAM
  • Nurul Shakila Khalid School of Town Planning & Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UiTM) SHAH ALAM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1875

Keywords:

lost spaces, elevated rail lines, design strategy, placemaking

Abstract

Elevated highways and rail lines create a vertical split, obstacles, and divisions at ground level, whereby the space above is used exclusively for transit. Conversely, the space below often becomes a void or is identified as lost space. Law enforcement has largely overlooked the area below the elevated highways and rail lines, which has become a hot spot for criminal activities and consequently, a location many people ignore due to its perceived safety. The residual spaces, also known as the leftover spaces under the elevated highways and rail lines, are often perceived as the negative aspects of urban spaces. Many relevant parties, such as urban planners, landscape architects, and urban designers, have been attempting to transform the spaces for various purposes which are community-friendly. This paper aims to examine the lost spaces beneath elevated rail lines in an urban area. The main intention is to evaluate the potential of converting these lost spaces into useful areas for the public. The results of this paper identified the potential design strategies for promoting public activities. The study applied a qualitative method, using a case study as the subject matter. The approach also included a detailed site investigation and purposive sampling of interviews at the site. Results concluded that the lost spaces can be repurposed following the suggestions of the participants. The outcome of the analysis highlighted the potential activities for the public, which can serve as a useful reference to local authorities and urbanists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, E. C., & Minor, E. S. (2017). Vacant lots: An underexplored resource for ecological and social benefits in cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 21, 146-152.

De Girolamo, F. (2013). Time and regeneration: Temporary reuse in lost spaces. Planum. The Journal of Urbanism, 2(27), 68-101.Trancik, R. (1991). Finding lost space: theories of urban design. John Wiley & Sons.

Hamzah, M., Sinniah, G. K., & Rusli, N. (2024). Attributes and Activities in Public Urban Spaces of Malaysian Cities. Planning Malaysia, 22(31). Https://Doi.Org/10.21837/Pm.V22i31.14

Harun, N. Z., Jaffar, N., & Mansor, M. (2021). The Contributions of Public Space to the Social Sustainability of Traditional Settlements. Planning Malaysia, 19(19). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i19.1071

Khalid, N. S., Hilal, S., & Marzukhi, M. A. (2018). Lost space in urban core areas of Kuala Lumpur in relations to physical urban environment. Planning Malaysia, 16.

Kim, G., Miller, P. A., & Nowak, D. J. (2018). Urban vacant land typology: A tool for managing urban vacant land. Sustainable Cities and Society, 36, 144-156.

Lydon, M., Garcia, A., Lydon, M., & Garcia, A. (2015). A tactical urbanism how-to (pp. 171-208). Island Press/Center for Resource Economics.

Mseddi, A. (2020, June). Vacant Urban Spaces: Definitions, Challenges and Perspectives in Urban Regeneration. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Contemporary Affairs in Architecture and Urbanism-ICCAUA (Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 256-263).

Norberg-Schulz, C. (2019). Genius loci: towards a phenomenology of architecture (1979). Historic Cities: Issues in Urban Conservation, 8, 31.

Németh, J., & Langhorst, J. (2014). Rethinking urban transformation: Temporary uses for vacant land. Cities, 40, 143-150.

Simon, M., & Mseddi, A. (2020). The vacant urban space: Problems, possibilities, processes. Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 51(2), 101-107.

Topçu, K., & Ünal, B. (2022). Exploring lost spaces towards regaining them for urban life: The case of Konya historical city center. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning.

Trancik, R. (1986). Finding lost space: theories of urban design. John Wiley & Sons.

Trancik, R. (2007). What is lost space? In Urban Design Reader (pp. 63-69). Routledge.

Ultav, Z. T., Çağlar, T. N., & Drinkwater, S. B. D. (2016). Architectural literary analysis: Reading “The death of the Street” through Ballard’s literature and Trancik’s “Lost Space”. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 32(2).

Yalcin, D., & Kurkcuoglu, E. (2023). Place to space, space to place: A theoretical discussion on place-making in lost spaces. Turkish Journal of Sense of Place and Urban Studies, 1(1), 1-16.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-26

How to Cite

Karim, F. A., Abdullah, Y. A., Yakob, H., Raja Othman, R. N., & Khalid, N. S. (2025). REVIVING LOST SPACES BENEATH ELEVATED RAIL LINES IN URBAN AREAS. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 23(38). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1875

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>