VIRTUAL VISIONS FOR TANGIBLE TREASURES: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF EXTENDED REALITY'S ROLE IN URBAN HERITAGE SAFEGUARDING

Authors

  • Noor Farhana Alias Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA
  • Nurul Syala Abdul Latip Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA
  • Noor Hayati Ismail Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA
  • Osama Elrawi Faculty of Engineering, AL-AZHAR UNIVERSITY, EGYPT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i41.1999

Keywords:

Extended reality, Virtual reality, Augmented reality, Heritage preservation, Urban conservation, Bibliometric analysis, Cultural heritage, Digital technologies

Abstract

This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of published research on Extended Reality (XR), encompassing Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality, in the field of urban heritage preservation. The study maps research trends, key contributors, geographical distribution, thematic clusters, and collaboration patterns within this emerging interdisciplinary domain. The findings indicate substantial growth in XR related heritage studies between 2020 and 2024, reflecting increasing scholarly attention to immersive technologies in conservation, interpretation, and public engagement. The analysis further shows that research output is dominated by a limited number of countries and authors, while Malaysia remains an emerging contributor. Thematic clustering reveals that current scholarship extends beyond technological experimentation to include educational applications, human centered design, and heritage interpretation. These findings suggest strong potential for XR to support urban heritage safeguarding in Malaysia through context sensitive innovation, strategic collaboration, and improved institutional support. The study contributes a structured overview of the field and offers practical insights for policymakers, researchers, and heritage practitioners seeking to strengthen digitally enabled preservation strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appio, F. P., Cesaroni, F., & Minin, A. Di. (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the Intellectual Property Management and Strategy literature: a Document Co-citation Analysis. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2439194

Arayaphan, W., Intawong, K., & Puritat, K. (2022). Digitalization of ancient fabric using virtual reality technology at the Wieng Yong House Museum: The FabricVR project. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2022.e00233

Badami, M., Benatallah, B., & Baez, M. (2023). Adaptive search query generation and refinement in systematic literature review. Information Systems, 117, 102231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2023.102231

Chen, S., Tian, Y., & Pei, S. (2024). Technological Use from the Perspective of Cultural Heritage Environment: Augmented Reality Technology and Formation Mechanism of Heritage-Responsibility Behaviors of Tourists. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188261

Cho, K. Y., Kusumo, C., Tan, K. K. H., & Rasoolimanesh, S. M. (2024). Stakeholders' perception on sustainability indicators for urban heritage sites in Kuala Lumpur and George Town, Malaysia. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-04-2023-0046

Costa, A. P., Moresi, E. D., Pinho, I., & Halaweh, M. (2023). Integrating Bibliometrics and Qualitative Content Analysis for Conducting a Literature Review. 2023 24th International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT58888.2023.10453680

De Sousa, M. N. A., Almeida, E. P. de O., & Bezerra, A. L. D. (2024). Bibliometrics: what is it? What is it used for? And how to do it? Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo, 16(2), e3042. https://doi.org/10.55905/cuadv16n2-021

Dubey, P., Dubey, P., Agrawal, P. K., Chourasia, H., Nayak, M., & Gehani, H. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Data Science Research: A Decade of Insights from Web of Science. 2023 Fourth International Conference on Smart Technologies in Computing, Electrical and Electronics (ICSTCEE), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTCEE60504.2023.10585030

Fauzi, H., Sharif, H. M., & Razak, R. A. (2022). Virtualization of Digitalized Cultural Assets to Promote Sustainable Heritage Tourism in Malaysia. International Journal of Environment, Architecture, and Societies, 2(02), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.26418/ijeas.2022.2.02.85-99

Herlina, S., Kusumah, Y. S., & Juandi, D. (2024). Global Research on Emerging Digital Technology: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 51(2), 281–294.

https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.51.2.281294

Hui Ling, N., Abdullah, F., & Su Huey, T. (2023). UNESCO World Heritage Site Recognition in Malaysia via an Emerging Technology Platforms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i11/19147

İri, R., & Ünal, E. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis Bibliometric Analysis of Research (1980-2023). Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(2), 386–403. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1446738

Langlais, P.-C. (2023). Bibliometrics. https://doi.org/10.52949/73

Lou, E. C. W., Lee, A., & Lim, Y. M. (2022). Stakeholder preference mapping: the case for built heritage of Georgetown, Malaysia. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 12(3), 291–308.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-08-2020-0114

Mohd Dian, A., Ikhsan, M. I., & Tunku Makmar Nizamuddin, T. I. M. (2022). Human Rights-Based Approach and Challenges in Malaysia's Built Heritage Preservation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i8/14198

Mudička, Š., & Kapica, R. (2023). Digital Heritage, the Possibilities of Information Visualisation through Extended Reality Tools. In Heritage (Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 112–131). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6010006

Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today's Academic World. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012

Robledo-Giraldo, S., Figueroa-Camargo, J. G., Zuluaga-Rojas, M. V., Vélez-Escobar, S. B., & Duque- Hurtado, P. L. (2023). Mapping, evolution, and application trends in co-citation analysis: a scientometric approach. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 13(1), 201–214.

https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v13.n1.2023.16070

Rossini, P. (2024). Networks as interpretative frameworks: using co-citation analysis to explore large corpora of early modern letters. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 39(1), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqad086

Shein, E. (2022). Preserving the past with immersive technologies. Communications of the ACM, 65(12), 15–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3565978

Tennant, J. (2020). Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge. European Science Editing, 46. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2020.e51987

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Yan, L., & Zhiping, W. (2023). Mapping the Literature on Academic Publishing: A Bibliometric Analysis on WOS. Sage Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231158562

Downloads

Published

2026-04-13

How to Cite

Alias, N. F., Abdul Latip, N. S., Ismail, N. H., & Elrawi, O. (2026). VIRTUAL VISIONS FOR TANGIBLE TREASURES: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF EXTENDED REALITY’S ROLE IN URBAN HERITAGE SAFEGUARDING. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 24(41). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i41.1999

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>