PILOT STUDY FINDINGS ON MULTI-GENERATIONAL HOUSING ENVIRONMENT PREFERENCES FEATURES FOR QUALITY OF LIFE AND ACTIVE AGEING IN MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i41.2012Keywords:
Multi-Generational, Housing Preferences, Quality of Life, Active Ageing, Reliability AnalysisAbstract
The rise in Malaysia's ageing population has increased the need for housing environments that can support both ageing in place and multi-generational living. This study aims to assess the reliability of a newly developed framework that focuses on the features of housing environments which contribute to the quality of life for the active ageing community. A pilot study was conducted to assess the internal consistency of the survey instrument, which was developed based on physical and social housing features identified through an in-depth literature review. A total of 31 respondents from different generational groups in Shah Alam participated in the study. The findings showed strong internal reliability across most sub-features, including Accessibility and Walkability, Communal Areas, Assisted Technology Integration, Community Engagement, and Health and Well-Being. However, the Personal Privacy sub-features revealed a lower reliability score. Overall, the results demonstrate the instrument’s potential to guide a better housing design, policy making, and further research in creating inclusive, age-friendly environments that support intergenerational connection and support active ageing.
Downloads
References
Aclan, R., George, S., Block, H., Lane, R., & Laver, K. (2023). Middle aged and older adult’s perspectives of their own home environment: A review of qualitative studies and meta-synthesis. BMC Geriatrics, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04279-1
Alipour, S., & Meshkini, A. (2024). Dream housing: Exploring effective factors on housing livability in the neighbourhood from the perspective of residents. Environmental Development, 101067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101067
Aripin, D., Osman, M. M., Rabe, N. S., Shuhaimi, A. a. A., & Suaree, N. a. S. M. (2024). Residents’ perception on management bodies’ service deliverables: The case of affordable strata housing in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 22. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i34.1597
Arshard, W. N. R. M., Samsudin, P. Y., Khamaruzaman, A. R., & Yusof, A. F. (2023, December 1). Satisfaction with elderly facilities in multigenerational family living in Kuala Lumpur. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajress/article/view/24453
Bahuri, N. H. A., Rizal, H., Said, M. A., Myint, P. K., & Su, T. T. (2022). Active ageing awareness and quality of life among pre-elder Malaysian public employees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9034. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159034
Bujang, M. A., Lai, W. H., Hon, Y. K., Yap, E. P. P., Tiong, X. T., Ratnasingam, S., Kim, A. R. J., Husin, M., Jee, Y. Y. H., Ahmad, N. F. D., & Haniff, J. (2023). Measuring population health and quality of life: Developing and testing of the significant quality of life measure (SigQOLM). Heliyon, 9(12), e22668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22668
Bujang, M. A., Omar, E. D., Foo, D. H. P., & Hon, Y. K. (2024). Sample size determination for conducting a pilot study to assess reliability of a questionnaire. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e3
Chalise, H. N. (2023). Healthy ageing: A basic concept. Asian Journal of Population Sciences, 2(1), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajps.v2i1.51096
Chou, Y. C., & Kröger, T. (2022). Ageing in place together: Older parents and ageing offspring with intellectual disability. Ageing & Society, 42(2), 480-494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20001038
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020). Population projections, Malaysia, 2010–2040.
Fuchs, O., Lorenz, E., & Fuchs, L. (2024). Generational differences in attitudes towards work and career: A systematic literature review on the preferences of generations X, Y and Z. 11, 54-71.
Gawlak, A., Matuszewska, M., & Skórka, A. (2021). Housing expectations of future seniors based on an example of the inhabitants of Poland. Buildings, 11(7), 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11070305
He, Z., & Jiang, C. (2023). Aging in place or institutionalization? A multiscale analysis of independent-living older adults from four large cities in China’s Yangtze River Delta. Innovation in Aging, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad014
Ismail, H., Muhamad Halil, F., Zainan Abidin, A. W., & Hasim, M. S. (2020). The elderly (senior) housing preferences among generations in Malaysia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(13), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v5i13.2102
Lak, A., Rashidghalam, P., Myint, P. K., & Baradaran, H. R. (2020). Erratum: Correction to: Comprehensive 5P framework for active aging using the ecological approach: An iterative systematic review. BMC Public Health, 20, 101.
Ling, T., Lu, H., Kao, Y., Chien, S., Chen, H., & Lin, L. (2023). Understanding the meaningful places for aging-in-place: A human-centric approach toward inter-domain design criteria consideration in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021373
Loke, Y. J., Lim, E. S., & Senadjki, A. (2020). Health promotion and active aging among seniors in Malaysia. Journal of Health Research, 35(5), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhr-07-2019-0148
Mola, D. W., & Shaw, D. (2024). Assessing the reliability of the talent development environmental questionnaire: A pilot study. International Journal of Research - GRANTHAALAYAH, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v12.i3.2024.5584
Nassir, S., Leong, T. W., & Robertson, T. (2015). Positive ageing: Elements and factors for design. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (pp. 264–268). https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838796
National Human Resource Centre. (2022, June 29). A guide to multigenerational workforce. https://nhrc.com.my/resource-centre/a-guide-to-multigenerational-workforce/
Nayak, S. R., Dash, S. P., Amin, P. S., & Priyashantha, K. G. (2023). A review on intergenerational cohousing: A possible living option for elderly and youth. New Design Ideas, 7(3), 535-556.
Paúl, C., Ribeiro, O., & Teixeira, L. (2012). Active ageing: An empirical approach to the WHO model. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, 2012, 382972. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/382972
Reed, R. G., & Conisbee, N. (2005). Identifying linkages between generations and community development - the effect on residential and retail property. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242673472_Identifying_linkages_between_generations_and_community_development__the_effect_on_residential_and_retail_property
Sharifi, S., Mosafer, H., Rahmati, M., Khorzoughi, K. B., & Parandeh, A. (2024). Dwelling characteristics and mental well-being in older adults: A systematic review. Heliyon, e37676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e376
Stewart, L. (2024, December 6). Purposive sampling in qualitative research. ATLAS.ti. https://atlasti.com/research-hub/purposive-sampling
Sundram, S., & Romli, N. (2023). A pilot study to test the reliability and validity of the research instrument. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(3), e002149. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i3.2149
Vuković, M. (2023). Generational differences in behavioral factors affecting real estate purchase intention. Property Management, 42(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/pm-11-2022-0088
World Health Organization. (2020). Decade of healthy ageing: 2020–2030. https://www.who.int/initiatives/decade-of-healthy-ageing
Xu, S., Zhang, T., Fukuda, H., He, J., & Bao, X. (2024). Comprehensive study of residential environment preferences and characteristics among older adults: Empirical evidence from China. Buildings, 14(7), 2175. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072175
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
