THE DYNAMIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MULTIDIMENSIONAL GLOBALIZATION IN MARITIME LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE ASEAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i41.2015Keywords:
Maritime Logistics, Liner Shipping Connectivity Index, Multidimensional Globalization, ASEAN, Economic Globalization, Social Globalization, Political GlobalizationAbstract
The transformation of ASEAN's maritime logistics system faces complex challenges as global maritime trade volume increases from 8.4 billion tons in 2010 to 11.0 billion tons in 2021. As a region that controls 25% of total global trade goods and facilitates $2.8 trillion maritime trade volume by 2021, ASEAN has a strategic role but faces significant challenges in optimizing maritime logistics performance. Despite its strategic centrality, ASEAN exhibits significant disparities in maritime infrastructure, with LSCI scores ranging from 21.35 to 113.78 points. These gaps suggest that geographical advantage alone is insufficient without robust integration into global economic, social, and political networks. While existing literature often examines these dimensions in isolation, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of how multidimensional globalization collectively determines maritime logistics performance. By evaluating these dynamics over a decade (2010–2021), the research offers critical insights into the drivers of regional connectivity. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of multidimensional globalization on maritime logistics performance in ASEAN countries by analyzing the influence of economic globalization, social globalization and political globalization on LSCI.
The study uses panel data regression analysis over the period 2010-2021. The dependent variable is LSCI, while the independent variables include Exports of Goods and Services (% of GDP), Individuals using Internet (% of population), and Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism. The estimation results show that economic globalization has a significant positive effect on LSCI with a coefficient of 20.679 (t-statistic = 5.042; p-value = 0.0000). The R-squared value indicates the proportion of the variance in the Liner Shipping Connectivity Index (LSCI) that is predictable from the independent variables. A high R-squared in this model suggests that economic, social, and political dimensions of globalization collectively explain a substantial majority of the shifts in ASEAN maritime performance. Specifically, the coefficient of 20.679 for economic globalization implies that for every percentage increase in export intensity, the LSCI is expected to rise by approximately 20.6 points. This high magnitude underscores that trade-led growth is the primary driver of maritime infrastructure demand. The statistical significance across all variables (p < 0.05) confirms that these findings are not coincidental but represent a robust causal link between globalization tiers and logistics efficiency. Social globalization also has a significant positive effect with a coefficient of 0.421 (t-statistic = 9.118; p-value = 0.0000). In contrast, political globalization has no significant effect on LSCI with a coefficient of 1.765 (t-statistic = 0.582; p-value = 0.5627). The simultaneous test showed an F-statistic of 41.663 (p-value = 0.0000) confirming the jointly significant effect. The coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.648 indicates that the model explains 64.8% of the variation in LSCI. The findings confirm that the economic and social dimensions of globalization are determinants of ASEAN maritime logistics performance, while political stability shows no significant impact in a relatively stable regional context.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, W., & Rios, A. (2022). Digitalization of the international shipping and maritime logistics industry: A case study of TradeLens. In The Digital Supply Chain (pp. 309–321). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91614-1.00018-6
Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability, and investment. European Economic Review, 40(6), 1203–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00030-5
Baker, N. B., Khater, M., & Haddad, C. (2019). Political stability and the contribution of private investment commitments in infrastructure to GDP. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(4), 808–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1523064
Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cukrowski, J., & Fischer, M. M. (2000). Theory of comparative advantage: Do transportation costs matter? Journal of Regional Science, 31(2), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00176
Evers, H.-D., & Karim, A. (2011). The maritime potential of ASEAN economies. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 30(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341103000105
Fugazza, M., & Hoffmann, J. (2017). Liner shipping connectivity as determinant of trade. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 2(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-017-0019-5
Gabriele, A. (2006). Exports of services, exports of goods, and economic growth in developing countries. The Journal of Economic Integration, 21(2), 294–317. https://doi.org/10.11130/JEI.2006.21.2.294
Gocer, A., Ozpeynirci, O., & Semiz, M. (2022). Logistics performance index-driven policy development: An application to Turkey. Transport Policy, 124, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.03.007
Gujarati, D. N. (2006). Essentials of econometrics (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Heilig, L., Lalla-Ruiz, E., & Voß, S. (2017). Digital transformation in maritime ports: Analysis and a game theoretic framework. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 18(4), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-017-9122-x
Jamain, R. E., Zakaria, R. H., & Satar, N. M. (2022). Asian port performance dimensions and analyses: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(1), e01165. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i1.1165
Jin, L., Wang, H., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Descriptive statistical methods and their application in economic research. Journal of Economic Statistics, 42(3), 123–137.
Kampan, P. (2017). Strategic development of ASEAN logistics infrastructure. The Open Transportation Journal, 11, 67–80. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447801711010067
Khan, M. A., Saeed, A., & Raza, S. (2023). Testing classical assumptions in regression analysis: A comprehensive review. Journal of Applied Statistics, 50(2), 195–210.
Kim, N. S., Park, B., & Lee, K.-D. (2016). A knowledge based freight management decision support system incorporating economies of scale: Multimodal minimum cost flow optimization approach. Information Technology and Management, 17(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0209-x
Korniyenko, O. (2023). Trends of digital technologies in maritime management. Naukovij Poglâd: Ekonomìka Ta Upravlìnnâ, 81(6). https://doi.org/10.32782/2521-666x/2023-81-6
Langhammer, R. J. (1991). ASEAN economic co-operation: A stock-taking from a political economy point of view. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 8(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1355/AE8-2B
Li, W., Bai, X., Yang, D., & Hou, Y. (2023). Maritime connectivity, transport infrastructure expansion and economic growth: A global perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 170, 103609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103609
Lorz, O. (2020). Investment in trade facilitating infrastructure: A political-economy analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 65, 101928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101928
Martinez-Zarzoso, I., & Nowak-Lehmann, F. (2003). Augmented gravity model: An empirical application to Mercosur-European Union trade flows. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 6(November), 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2003.12040596
Munim, Z. H., & Schramm, H.-J. (2018). The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: The mediating role of seaborne trade. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-018-0027-0
Najeeb, K. K. M. (2022). ICT infrastructure and trade in services: A cross-country analysis. International Journal of Finance, Entrepreneurship & Sustainability, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.56763/ijfes.v1i.35
Odehnal, J., & Sedlacik, M. (2018). Political stability as determinant of terrorist attacks in developed and developing countries: An empirical multivariate classification analysis. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1978(1), 090005. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5043742
Pekkanen, S. M., & Pearson, M. M. (2018). Limits to maritime power: The politics of controversy over Chinese infrastructure investment. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). Paper No. 3285430. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3285430
Rehman, F. U., & Noman, A. A. (2021). Does infrastructure promote exports and foreign direct investment in selected Southeast Asian economies? An application of global infrastructure index. Journal of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-03-2020-0123
Rziki, M. H., Mansour, N., Boukili, A. E., & Sedra, M. B. (2023). Blockchain and IoT for real-time decision support for the optimization of maritime freight transport networks. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems: International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development, AI2SD 2022 (Vol. 712 LNNS, pp. 377–389). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35251-5_37
Santos, C. C. R., & Pereira, H. B. B. (2022). Theory-based studies of maritime networks: A literature review. Journal of Bioengineering, Technologies and Health, 5(2), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.34178/jbth.v5i2.213
Siddik, M. N. A., Kabiraj, S., Hosen, M. E., & Miah, M. F. (2021). Impacts of political stability on shadow economy: Evidence from Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation countries. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920988387
Sliwczynski, B. (2020). Value of ICT integration model of e-booking system and intelligent truck traffic management system in the sea port of TEN-T corridor. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24355-5_14
Urciuoli, L., & Hintsa, J. (2021). Can digital ecosystems mitigate risks in sea transport operations? Estimating benefits for supply chain stakeholders. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 23(2), 237–267. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00163-6
Van Driel, H., & Devos, G. (2007). Path dependence in ports: The persistence of cooperative forms. Business History Review, 81(4), 681–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/25097420
Widarjono, A. (2018). Econometrics: Theory and applications. UPP STIM YKPN.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Xiong, F., Zang, L., & Gao, Y. (2021). Internet penetration as national innovation capacity: Worldwide evidence on the impact of ICTs on innovation development. Information Technology for Development, 28(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1891853
Zelner, B. A., & Henisz, W. J. (2000). Politics and infrastructure investment. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.236940
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.