BEHAVIOUR DETERMINANTS OF INDIVIDUAL INTENTIONS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION IN KLANG VALLEY, SELANGOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i43.2131Keywords:
Climate Change Adaptation, Protection Motivation Theory, Behavioural Intention, Climate Resilience, Urban PlanningAbstract
Climate change poses increasing environmental, social, and economic challenges, particularly in highly urbanised regions such as the Klang Valley, Malaysia, where strengthening climate resilience has become an important environmental planning priority. Understanding the behavioural factors that influence individuals' intentions to adopt climate change adaptation measures is essential for developing effective community-based adaptation strategies and supporting climate-resilient urban planning. This study applied the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) to examine the influence of threat appraisal and coping appraisal on behavioural intention towards climate change adaptation. A quantitative survey involving 450 respondents was conducted using a multistage cluster sampling technique, and the data were analysed using descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression. The findings revealed that the overall level of behavioural intention towards climate change adaptation was medium-high. Response efficacy (β = 1.534, p < 0.001), self-efficacy (β = 1.331, p < 0.001), and response cost (β = 0.480, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of behavioural intention, whereas perceived severity and perceived vulnerability were not statistically significant. The positive association observed for response cost suggests that perceived financial and practical challenges did not necessarily discourage respondents from adopting climate change adaptation measures. These findings provide valuable insights for environmental planners, local authorities, and policymakers in designing targeted interventions that strengthen community preparedness, enhance adaptive capacity, and support climate-resilient urban development.
Downloads
References
Alwreikat, A. (2024). Vaccination hesitancy: Applying the protection motivation theory on parents' information behavior. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241261637
Bubeck, P., Osberghaus, D., & Thieken, A. H. (2023). Explaining changes in threat appraisal, coping appraisal, and flood risk-reducing behavior using panel data from a nation-wide survey in Germany. Environment and Behavior, 55(4), 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165231176069
Chen, S.-L., Hsu, H.-T., & Chinomona, R. (2023). How tourists' perceived risk affects behavioral intention through crisis communication in the post-COVID-19 era. Mathematics, 11(4), 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11040860
Chen, Y., Zhou, R., Chen, B., Chen, H., Li, Y., Chen, Z., Zhu, H., & Wang, H. (2020). Knowledge, perceived beliefs, and preventive behaviors related to COVID-19 among Chinese older adults: Cross-sectional web-based survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(12), e23729. https://doi.org/10.2196/23729
Chen, Y.-L., Lin, Y.-J., Chang, Y.-P., Chou, W.-J., & Yen, C.-F. (2021). Differences in the protection motivation theory constructs between people with various latent classes of motivation for vaccination and preventive behaviors against COVID-19 in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 7042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137042
Kothe, E. J., Ling, M., Mullan, B. A., Rhee, J. J., & Klas, A. (2023). Increasing intention to reduce fossil fuel use: A protection motivation theory-based experimental study. Climatic Change, 176(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03489-1
Lee, J. C., Chen, L., & Zhang, H. (2023). Exploring the adoption decisions of mobile health service users: A behavioral reasoning theory perspective. Industrial Management and Data Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-11-2022-0682
Mahmood, J., & Guinto, R. R. (2022). Impacts of climate change on human health: Emerging evidence and call to action. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 29(5), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2022.29.5.1
Marikyan, D., & Papagiannidis, S. (2023, September 27). Theory Hub. https://open.ncl.ac.uk/theories/10/protection-motivation-theory/
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Ogada, M. J., Rao, E. J. O., Radeny, M., Recha, J. W., & Solomon, D. (2020). Climate-smart agriculture, household income and asset accumulation among smallholder farmers in the Nyando basin of Kenya. World Development Perspectives, 18, 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100203
Olaniyi, F. O. (2020). Perception and level of awareness of climate change among adult learners on attendance and performance in literacy centres, Ondo State, Nigeria. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 1(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v1i3.136
Sahrir, S., Yalçınkaya, N. M., & Say, N. (2022). Exploring risk perception and intention to improve the air quality. Planning Malaysia, 20(22). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i22.1140
Said, M. Z., Abdul Gapor, S., & Hamat, Z. (2024). Flood vulnerability and adaptation assessment in Padang Terap District, Kedah, Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 22(31). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i31.1450
Tsai, F.-J., Yang, H.-W., Lin, C.-P., & Liu, J. Z. (2021). Acceptability of COVID-19 vaccines and protective behavior among adults in Taiwan: Associations between risk perception and willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5579. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115579
van Valkengoed, A. M., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2024). From believing in climate change to adapting to climate change: The role of risk perception and efficacy beliefs. Risk Analysis, 44(3), 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14193
Waller, L., Rayner, T., Chilvers, J., Gough, C. A., Lorenzoni, I., Jordan, A., & Vaughan, N. (2020). Contested framings of greenhouse gas removal and its feasibility: Social and political dimensions. WIREs Climate Change, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.649
Wang, J., Guan, Y., Wu, L., Guan, X., Cai, W., Huang, J., Dong, W., & Zhang, B. (2021). Changing lengths of the four seasons by global warming. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl091753
Wang, S., Wang, J., Yang, S., Li, J., & Zhou, K. (2020). From intention to behavior: Comprehending residents' waste sorting intention and behavior formation process. Waste Management, 113, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.031
Weyrich, P., Mondino, E., Borga, M., Di Baldassarre, G., Patt, A., & Scolobig, A. (2020). A flood-risk-oriented, dynamic protection motivation framework to explain risk reduction behaviours. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 20(1), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-287-2020
Wright, A. C., Browne, J., Cather, C., Pratt, S. I., Bartels, S. J., & Mueser, K. T. (2020). Does self-efficacy predict functioning in older adults with schizophrenia? A cross-sectional and longitudinal mediation analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 45(1), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10171-8
Xue, M., Zhao, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhang, B. (2021). Behavioural determinants of an individual's intention to adapt to climate change: Both internal and external perspectives. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 91, 106672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106672
Yadav, R., Kumar, D., Kumar, A., & Luthra, S. (2023). How does anticipatory trauma reaction and climate-friendly behaviour make an affect at the individual level? The role of social norms and self-efficacy. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3352
Zhang, L., Ruiz-Menjivar, J., Luo, B., Liang, Z., & Swisher, M. E. (2020). Predicting climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviors in agricultural production: A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101408
Zhou, S. (2022). Impact of pandemic proximity and media use on risk perception during COVID-19 in China. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 13(1), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.2003875
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysian Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
