THE BENEFITS OF RIVER INDICATORS TO ASSESS THE ECOLOGICAL STATUS OF IIUM CAMPUS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i1.237Keywords:
IIUM campus, sustainable, ecological indicator, riverAbstract
The concept of sustainable campus has emerged from the social, economic and environmental impacts due to anthropogenic activities around the world. One of the initiatives of sustainable campus is the application of ecological indicators. The indicators provide information about the current condition and early warning on the possible risks of environmental impacts to the campus environment. However, lack of understanding on the values of natural ecosystem in campusand the lack of proper planning has led to the depletion of natural ecosystem. The study seeks to examine river degradation in IIUM campus and to explore the benefits of river indicators towards achieving IIUM as an ecologically sustainable campus. Data were gathered using a qualitative approach involving three methods of data collection namely: (i) document analysis, (ii) semi-structured interview and (iii) site inventory. The finding reveals that the application of river channel morphology indicators is an important basis for physical planning in making a campus ecologically sustainable. Further analysis suggests that the suitable indicators to assess the condition of IIUM River are the river channel morphology indicators such as width, depth, channel pattern and slope ratio. The process of selecting the indicators are carried out based on six criteria of good indicators discussed in this study. The study concluded that the application of river channel
morphology indicators is a critical process in physical planning of a sustainable campus as it contributes in preventing the loss of natural ecosystem and it offers a credible basis for creating a conducive place for campus residents.
Downloads
References
Campos, P. (2008). Sustainable education campus in Spain - nature and architecture for training. PEB Exchange, 10, 7. DOI: 10.1787/16097548
Cole, L. (2003). Assessing sustainability on Canadian university campuses: development of a campus sustainability assessment framework. Royal Roads University.
Howitt, R. & Rickards, S. (2013). Complete campus engagement via embedding ecological footprinting curriculum. In Proceedings of the 13th International Australasian Campuses towards Sustainability (ACTS) Conference, Sydney, Australia.
Mebratu, D. (1998). Sustainability and sustainable development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18(6), 493-520.
Saadatian, O., Salleh, E., Mohd Tahir, O., & Dola, K. (2009). Observation of sustainability practices in Malaysian research universities: highlighting particular strength. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 17(2), 225-244.
United Nations Environment Programme. (2014). Greening universities toolkit. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/training/docs/Greening_University_ Toolkit.pdf
World Commission on Environment and Development [WCED] (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zen, I. S., Bandi, M., Zakaria, R., & Saleh, A. L. (2013). UTM sustainable campus: institutionalize sustainability, the living lab approach and sustainable energy management program. International Workshop on UI Greenmatric 2013, Depok City, Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.