MODELLING WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR IMPROVED PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICES: THE CHALLENGES OF NON-RESPONSE TO STATED PREFERENCE HYPOTHETICAL QUESTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i1.250Keywords:
Public transport, bus, willingness to pay, frequency, increased fareAbstract
The paper focuses on the modelling attempt of willingness to pay for an improved bus service in selected cities and towns of Malaysia. Using responses from onboard intercept surveys, 1,130 samples of bus passengers have been analysed so as to arrive at a simplified model of how passengers trade off their money with possible upgrading of bus services elements. The willingness to pay among these bus riders was very low, despite the high expectation of improvements aspired by them. For service providers, fares are a function of travel time, travel distance and other operating costs. For passengers, the utility function is explained by costs, time, distance and various latent parameters. This paper highlights the significant results of chi-square analysis at various confidence levels. However, modelling the exact utility function of preferences for staggered increased in fares could not be carried out successfully at 95 percent confidence level, due to the relatively small number of respondents stating their and/or undecided response towillingness to pay for the additional fare rate. The issue of non-response to hypothetical survey questions is also raised, explaining the difficulties in modelling this choice behaviour.
Downloads
References
Dodgson, J. S. & Katsoulacos, Y. (1988). Quality competition in bus services: some welfare implications of bus deregulation. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22(3), 263-281.
Duffy, B., & Smith, K. (2005). Comparative data from online and face-to-face surveys.
International Journal of Market Research, 47(6), 615-639.
Espino, R., Roman, C., & De Ortuzar, J. D. (2006). Analysing demand for suburban trips: a mixed rp/sp model with latent variables and interaction effects. Transportation, 33(3), 241-261.
Gibbs Jr., R. W., & Bryant, G. A. (2008). Striving for optimal relevance when answering questions. Cognition, 106, 345-369.
Hensher, D. A., & Stanley, J. (2003). Performance-based quality contacts in bus service provision. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37(6), 519-538.
Hess, D. B., Brown, J., & Shoup, D. (2004). Waiting for the bus. Public Transportation, 7(4), 67-84.
Li, Z., Hensher, D. A., & Rose, J.M. (2010). Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: A review and some new empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(3), 384-403.
Lietz, P. (2008). Questionnaire design in attitude and opinion research: current state of an art (655 Working Paper), Jacobs University, Bremen.
Liu, Z., & Jansen, B. J. (2017). Identifying and Predicting the Desire to Help in Social Question and Answering. Information Processing and Management, 53, 490-504.
Manisera, M., & Zuccolotto (2014). Modelling “Don’t Know†Responses in Rating Scales. Pattern Recognition Letters, 45, 226-234.
Martinez-Espineira, R., & Lyssenko, N. (2012). An alternative approaches to dealing with respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: a comparative analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 93, 130-139.
O’Garra, T., Mourato, S., Garrity, L. et al. (2007) Is the public willing to pay for hydrogen buses: a comparative study of preference in four cities. Energy Policy, 35(7), 36303642.
Phanikumar, C. V., & Maitra, B. (2007). Willingness to pay and preference heterogeneity for rural bus attributes. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 133(1), 62-69.
Pedesson, P. A. (2003). On the optimal fare policies in urban transportation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(5), 423-435.
Politis, I., Papaioannou, P., Basbas, S., & Dimitriadis, N. (2010). Evaluation of a bus passenger information system from the users’ point of view in the city of Thessaloniki, Greece. Research in Transportation Economics, 29(1), 249-255.
Ricci, M., Bellaby, P., & Flynn, R. (2008). What do we know about public perceptions and acceptance of hydrogen bus? A critical review and new case study evidence. International Journal Hydrogen Energy, 33(21), 5868-5880.
Sanchez, M. E., & Morchio, G. (1992). Probing “don’t know†answers effects on survey estimates and variables relationships. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 454-474.
Saxe, M., Folkesson, A., & Alvfors, P. (2007). A follow up and conclusive report on the attitude towards hydrogen fuel cells buses in the cute project - from passengers in Stockholm to bus operators in Europe. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(7), 4295-4305.
Turvey, R., & Mohring, H. (1975). Optimal bus fares. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 9(3), 280-286.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
