CHILDREN’S DIRECT AND INDIRECT EXPERIENCES WITH NATURE AND THEIR CONNECTEDNESS TO NATURE

Authors

  • Nor Diyana Mustapa Faculty of Architecture and Ekistics UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA KELANTAN
  • Nor Zarifah Maliki School of Housing, Building and Planning UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Nor Fadzila Aziz School of Housing, Building and Planning UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
  • Aswati Hamzah School of Educational Studies UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v17i10.641

Keywords:

children, connectedness to nature, direct experiences with nature, indirect experiences with nature

Abstract

Direct experiences with nature during childhood plays an important role to influence children’s connectedness to nature (CTN) as a child now and later as an adult. However, today’s children obtain nature experiences mostly through indirect ways (e.g. observing nature and vicarious learning), which may not have the same quality as direct ways (e.g. activities with plants and earth elements). Hence, this study aims to first identify the current trends of children experience nature and further examine the effects of both direct and indirect experiences with nature on their CTN. Questionnaires were distributed to 760 children from 20 schools include both urban and rural schools in Kedah and Penang, Malaysia. The data were analysed using mean score, standard deviation, and multiple regression. The results confirmed that the current trends of children having experiences with nature are more through indirect ways. Results also showed that indirect experiences with nature make more contribution to children’s CTN than direct experiences. Overall, this study highlights that indirect experiences with nature can be an alternative and effective way to develop children’s CTN without neglecting the importance of direct experiences with nature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aaron, R. F., & Witt, P. A. (2011). Urban students’ definitions and perceptions of nature. Children Youth and Environments, 21(2), 145-167.

Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Nature-based excursions: School students’ perceptions of learning in natural environments. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(3), 218-236.

Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(2014), 1-17.

Castonguay, G. (2010). Children’s use of the outdoor environment in a low-income Montreal neighborhood. Children, Youth and Environments, 20(1), 200-230.

Chawla, L. (2007). Childhood experiences associated with care for the natural world: A theoretical framework for empirical results. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), 144-170.

Chawla, L., & Derr, V. (2012). The development of conservation behaviours in childhood and youth. In S. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 527-555). New York: Oxford University Press.

Cheng, J. C.-H., & Monroe, M. C. (2010). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31-49.

Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45-65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cohen, S., & Horm-Wingerd, D. (1993). Children and the environment: Ecological awareness among preschool children. Environment and Behavior, 25(1), 103-120.

Collado, S., Staats, H., & Corraliza, J. A. (2013). Experiencing nature in children’s summer camps: Affective, cognitive and behavioural consequences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33(2013), 37-44.

Duerden, M. D., & Witt, P. A. (2010). The impact of direct and indirect experiences on the development of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 379-392.

Gundersen, V., Skår, M., O’Brien, L., Wold, L. C., & Follo, G. (2016). Children and nearby nature: A nationwide parental survey from Norway. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 17, 116-125.

Holt, N. L., Lee, H., Millar, C. A., & Spence, J. C. (2015). `Eyes on where children play’: A retrospective study of active free play. Children’s Geographies, 13(1), 73-88.

Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H.-A., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2), 166-171.

Kellert, S. R. (2005). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature connection. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Larson, L. R., Green, G. T., & Castleberry, S. B. (2009). Construction and validation of an instrument to measure environmental orientations in a diverse group of children. Environment and Behavior, 43(1), 72-89.

Lin, B. B., Gaston, K. J., Fuller, R. A., Wu, D., Bush, R., & Shanahan, D. F. (2017). How green is your garden?: Urban form and socio-demographic factors influence yard vegetation, visitation, and ecosystem service benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 239-246.

Lohr, V. I., & Pearson-mims, C. H. (2005). Children’s active and passive interactions with plants inflence their attitudes and actions towards trees and gardening as adults. HorTechnology, 15(3), 472-476.

Louv, R. (2008). Last children in the woods. Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.

McAllister, C., Lewis, J., & Murphy, S. (2012). The green grass grew all around: Rethinking urban natural spaces with children in mind. Children, Youth and Environments, 22(2), 164-193.

Milfont, T. L. (2012). Cultural differences in environmental engagement. In S. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation (pp. 181-200). New York: Oxford University Press.

Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The big five personality traits and environmental engagement: Associations at the individual and societal level. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2), 187-195.

Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2008). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715-740.

Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th ed.). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

Robertson, M., Walford, R., & Fox, A. (2003). Landscape meanings and personal identities: Some perspectives of East Anglian children. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 12(1), 32-48.

Skår, M., & Krogh, E. (2009). Changes in children’s nature-based experiences near home: From spontaneous play to adult-controlled, planned and organised activities. Children’s Geographies, 7(3), 339-354.

Veitch, J., Bagley, S., Ball, K., & Salmon, J. (2006). Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents’ perceptions of influences on children’s active freeplay. Health & Place, 12(4), 383-393.

Wells, N. M., & Lekies, K. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences. Children Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1-24.

Zhang, W., Goodale, E., & Chen, J. (2014). How contact with nature affects children’s biophilia, biophobia and conservation attitude in China. Biological Conservation, 177, 109-116.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-04

How to Cite

Mustapa, N. D., Maliki, N. Z., Aziz, N. F., & Hamzah, A. (2019). CHILDREN’S DIRECT AND INDIRECT EXPERIENCES WITH NATURE AND THEIR CONNECTEDNESS TO NATURE. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v17i10.641