THE ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY FACED BY GAHAI AGROPOLITAN PARTICIPANTS

Authors

  • Mohd Khairi Ismail Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI) UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA
  • Chamburi Siwar Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI) UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA
  • Rospidah Ghazali Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI) UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA
  • Nor Zuriati Amani Ab Rani Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI) UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA
  • Basri Abdul Talib Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI) UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v17i10.645

Keywords:

vulnerability, Gahai Agropolitan, Malaysia

Abstract

Vulnerability is always related to the poor group. Vulnerability can be defined as being vulnerable to damage or ill effects because of changes in the society and the environment, and the inability to adapt to changes. In-depth understanding is important to probe what action should be taken to achieve the sustainability of the community and its environment. In Malaysia, the government has implemented various eradication programmes on rural poverty, and sustainable livelihoods, such as the agropolitan projects. Agropolitan projects are capable of achieving the objective to eradicate poverty, and the vulnerability faced by project participants which will affect their lives. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the vulnerability of agropolitan participants in Malaysia by utilising the Gahai Agropolitan, Lipis, Pahang project as a case study. This study used simple random sampling and it involved 45 participants of Gahai Agropolitan Project. Data were analysed using the Descriptive Analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). The findings showed that Gahai Agropolitan Project Participants faced multi-dimensional vulnerability in terms of economic, social, and physical and environmental aspects. Therefore, the Ministry of Rural Development (KKLW) and the Rubber Industry Smallholders Development Authority (RISDA) need to pay more attention to reduce the vulnerability to participants of the agropolitan project, and help them to increase their income and improve their lives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arokia Nathen, A., Selvaratnam, D. P., & Abu Bakar, N. (2011). Hubungan tingkat pendapatan dan kehidupan lestari: Kerangka konseptual. Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia ke VI (PERKEM VI), Ekonomi Berpendapatan Tinggi: Transformasi ke Arah Peningkatan Inovasi, Produktiviti dan Kualiti Hidup, June 5-7, 2011, Melaka, Malaysia.

Chaudhuri, S. (2003). Assessing vulnerability to poverty: Concepts, empirical methods and illustrative examples. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4461/840126dab19ab38692628d35de9516e6dcc0.pdf.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation

modelling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-336.

Christiaensen, L. J., & Boisvert, R. N. (2000). On measuring household food

vulnerability: Case evidence from Northern Mali. Ithaca, NY: Department of

Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University.

DFID (1999). Sustainable Livelihoods and Poverty Elimination. UK: Department for International Development.

Economic Planning Unit. (2015). Rancangan Malaysia Kesebelas 2015-2020. Kuala Lumpur: Jabatan Percetakan Negara.

Ghazali, R. (2017). Keterangkuman dan masyarakat saksama: Multidimensi

kemudahterancaman isi rumah B40. In Institut Tadbiran Awam Negara (Ed.).

Memperkasa sosioekonomi kelompok B40: Mendepani arus perdana (pp. 49-

. Kuala Lumpur: Author.

Hadi, A. S., Idrus, S., Mohamed, A. F., & Harman Shah, A. H. (2006). Perubahan persekitaran dan kemudahterancaman lembangan Langat. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.

Henninger, N. (1998). Mapping and geographic analysis of poverty and human welfare: Review and assessment. Report prepared for the UNEP-CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

Ibrahim, A. Z., & Siwar, C. (2017). Kelestarian penghidupan petani luar bandar. Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia

Idrus, S., Lim C. S., & Hadi, A. S. (2004). Kemudahterancaman (vulnerability) penduduk terhadap perubahan guna tanah di Selangor. Malaysian Journal of

Environmental Management, 5: 79-98.

Kementerian Luar Bandar dan Wilayah [KKLW] (2012). Garis panduan pengurusan ladang sejahtera projek agropolitan di bawah program lonjakan mega luar bandar (PLMLB). Putrajaya: Auhtor.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research

activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Md Akhir, N., Azman, A., Hassan, N., & Md Akhir, N. H. ( 2017). Kajian penelitian masalah mangsa bencana banjir disember 2014 di Kelantan. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Special Issue 3, 007.

Muyambo, F., Jordaan, A.J. & Bahta, Y.T., (2017). Assessing social vulnerability to drought in South Africa: Policy implication for drought risk reduction. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 9(1), a326.

Omar, M., Samsudin, M., Yussof, I., & Halim, S. A. (2012). Kemudahterancaman dan kelestarian hidup komuniti luar bandar: Satu penelitian dari sudut kerangka kelestarian hidup. Journal of Tropical Marine Ecosystem, 2, 71-82.

Radin Firdaus, R. B., Ibrahim, A. Z., Siwar, C., & Jaafar, A. H. (2014). Penghidupan petani padi dalam mendepani cabaran perubahan iklim: Peranan intervensi kerajaan menerusi Skim Subsidi Harga Padi (SSHP). Kajian Malaysia, 32(2), 73-92.

Serrat, O, (2008). The sustainable livelihoods approach. Knowledge Solutions, November 2008, 1-4

Downloads

Published

2019-09-04

How to Cite

Ismail, M. K., Siwar, C., Ghazali, R., Ab Rani, N. Z. A., & Abdul Talib, B. (2019). THE ANALYSIS OF VULNERABILITY FACED BY GAHAI AGROPOLITAN PARTICIPANTS. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v17i10.645