PUBLIC AWARENESS AND ACCEPTANCE TOWARDS TRANSPORTATION LOW CARBON CITY PROGRAMME. A COMPARISON STUDY OF MBSA AND DBKL

Authors

  • Na’asah Nasrudin Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
  • Ainatul Isnoriza George Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
  • Yusfida Ayu Abdullah Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
  • Marlyana Azyyati Marzukhi Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
  • Ling Oliver Hoon Leh Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
  • Kushairi Rashid Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i14.821

Keywords:

Low Carbon City, non-motorised transportation, public awareness and acceptance

Abstract

This paper examines public awareness and acceptance towards Transportation Low Carbon City’s (LCC) programme by two local authorities: Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) and Shah Alam City Council (MBSA). This paper also will measure the residents’ satisfaction level on the LCC programme initiatives prepared by both authorities. The data were gathered through a survey conducted randomly from 202 respondents who represented the residents of Kuala Lumpur city and 122 respondents who represented the residents of Shah Alam city. The findings suggested that the awareness of the respondents about the Transportation LCC's programme was more positive in Kuala Lumpur as compared to Shah Alam. This was because almost 90 per cent of Kuala Lumpur respondents were aware of the programme. For feedback of willingness to change to non-motorised transportation as a support to Transportation LCC programme, Kuala Lumpur had a bright hope to fully achieve the successfulness of the LCC's programme as compared to Shah Alam. With regards to implementation of public transportation, the majority of the both respondents’ groups agreed that the available public transportation was reliable, well-connected and reachable for their desired destination. This comparison study is essential to know how well the local authority manages their LCC programme. It is hoped that the two local authorities can learn and cooperate in future to make this programme a success.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ausserer, K. and Risser, R. (2005). Intelligent Transport systems and services – chances and risks. Proceedings of 18th ICTCT-workshop Helsinki, Finland.

Chismar and Wiley-Patton (2002). Does the Extended Technology Acceptance Model Apply to Physicians, Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’03)?

Dourish, P. and Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, CSCW ’92, pp. 107–114, New York, NY, USA.

Gross, T., Stary, C., and Totter, A. (2005). User-Centered Awareness in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work-Systems: Structured Embedding of Findings from Social Sciences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18(3):323–360.

KeTTHA (Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water Malaysia) (2011). Low Carbon Cities Framework & Assessment System. Putrajaya.

Loevstrand, L. (1991). Being Selectively Aware with the Khronika System. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work - ECSCW’91.

Michaels, C. F. (2000). Information, perception, and action: What should ecological psychologists learn from Milner and Goodale (1995)? Ecological Psychology, 12, 241–258.

Rao, V. S. P. and Narayana, P. S. (1998), Organisation Theory and Behaviour, pp. 329-330, Delhi: Konark Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-25

How to Cite

Nasrudin, N., George, A. I., Abdullah, Y. A., Marzukhi, M. A., Oliver Hoon Leh, L., & Rashid, K. (2020). PUBLIC AWARENESS AND ACCEPTANCE TOWARDS TRANSPORTATION LOW CARBON CITY PROGRAMME. A COMPARISON STUDY OF MBSA AND DBKL. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 18(14). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i14.821

Issue

Vol. 18 (2020): PLANNING MALAYSIA JOURNAL : Volume 18, Issue 4, 2020

Section

Article

License

Copyright & Creative Commons Licence

eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >>