VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN URBAN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, NORTHERN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v8i1.77Keywords:
Vehicle ownership, Quality of life, Private vehicles, Public transport, Residential neighborhoodAbstract
It is widely believed that owning a vehicle affects one's quality of life. In the United States, owning a car contributes positively to quality of life while in countries such as New Zealand, this impact is not always apparent. Private cars, particularly, has become a leading mode of transport due to its inherent advantages such as privacy, comfort and unrestricted freedom. Other than income, road infrastructure, urban land use pattern and government policies are all influential factors in determining vehicle ownership and usage. It is widely believed that vehicle ownership increases accessibility to better jobs, urban facilities, and social meeting places. This study examines the relationship between owning a private vehicle and social and economic satisfaction, as well as accessibility to public facilities. A total of 1,563 households were surveyed in six urban areas of northern Malaysia. The sample was stratified according to low-, middle-, and high-income neighborhoods. Cross tabulation analysis was done on levels of vehicle ownership and other variables to determine the level of satisfaction in economic and social quality of life. Approximately 99% of those surveyed owned at least a motorcycle while roughly a third owned both a car and a motorcycle. Majority expressed indifference to public transport and considered owning a vehicle a necessity for daily activities. A direct relationship was observed between the number of owned vehicles and the level of job and income satisfaction. Similarly, social interactions with neighbors, participation in community activities, satisfaction in ethnic relations, and attendance in religious services indicated a positive relationship with car ownership. These social satisfaction and economic fulfillment, as well as access to public amenities, are positively enhanced by vehicle ownership.Downloads
References
Barter, P.A. (2000). Urban Transport in Asia: Problems and Prospects for High Density Cities. Asia Pacific Development Monitor, 2, 1, pp: 33-66.
Bowling, A. (2003). Ageing Well: Quality of Life in Old Age. Mcgraw-Hill International Department of Assessment and Service Property (2008). Property Market Report 2008. Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E. and Smith, H.L. (1999). Subjective Well-being: Three Decades of Process. Physiological Bulletin 125 (2), pp: 276-302 Diener, E. (2000). Subjective Well-being. The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index. American Psychologist 55 (1), pp: 34-35 Dimitriou, Harry T. (1992). Urban Transport Planning: A Development Approach, Routledge, London
Economic Planning Unit (2002). Malaysian Quality of Life Report 2002. Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia Fielding, G.J. (1987). Managing Transit Strategically. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, California, USA
Frayers, M.P. and Machin, D. (2000). Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England.
Hensher, David A. (1987). Productive Efficiency and Ownership of Urban Bus Services. Transportation Vol. 14. pp: 209-225 Ibrahim, Muhammad Faishal (2003). Car Ownership and Attitudes Towards Transport Modes for Shopping Purpose in Singapore. Transportation Vol 30. pp: 435-457 lies, Richard. (2005). Public Transport in Developing Countries. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom
Kasipillai, J. and Chan, P. (2008). Travel Demand Management: Lessons for Malaysia.
Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp: 41-55 Kenworthy, J.R. and Laube, F.B. with Peter W.G. Newman, Paul A. Barter, Tamim Raad, Chamlong Poboon and Benedicto Guia Jr., (1999). An International Sourcebook of Automobile Dependence in Cities, 1960-1990. Boulder: Colorado University Press
Kubani, D. (2005). Transportation and Quality of Life in L.A. Los Angeles Business Journal, Cengage Learning, pp: 3-5
Mohamad, Jamilah and Kiggundu, A.T. (2007). The Rise of the Private Car in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Assessing the Policy Options. IATSS Research Vol 31 No 1, pp: 69-77
Mohd Yusof, Mohd Faudzi, Md. Nor, Nor Ghani and Radin Sohadi, Radin Umar (2003). The Economic Benefits of Preventing Motorcycle Injuries, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 5, pp: 2634-2649.
Moller, B., and Thogersen, J. (2008). Car Use Habits: An Obstacle to the Use of Public Transportation? in Road Pricing, the Economy and the Environment. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp: 301-313
Muhammad, Zainuddin (2001). Development of Urban Indicators: A Malaysian Initiative, Joy Jacqueline Pereira and Ibrahim Komoo (eds.), Geoindicators for Sustainable Development, Bangi: Institut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan (LESTARI)
Nhan, T. Tran, Adnan, A. Hyder, Subramaniam, Kulanthayan, Suret, Singh and Radin Sohadi, Radin Umar (2009). Engaging Policymakers in Road Safety Research in Malaysia: A Theoretical and Contextual Analysis. Health Policy Vol. 90, Issue 1, pp: 58-65
Pendakur, V.S. (1995). Gridlock in the Slopopolis: Congestion Management and Sustainable Development. In McGee, T.G., Robinson, I.M.,(eds). The Mega-Urban Regions of Southeast Asia. pp. 176-193. UBC Press. Vancouver.
Pisarki, Alan E. (2006). Commuting in America III. The Third National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., USA
Poboon, C. (2000). Coping with Bangkok’s Traffic Crisis: Lessons from Japanese Cities. “Asian Pacific Development Monitor†2(11), pp. 67-79
Potera, Carol (2004). Air Pollution: Asia’s Two-Stroke Engine Dilemma. Environmental Health Perspect. V. 112 (11)
Radin Sohadi, Radin Umar (2005) Update of Road Safety Status in Malaysia. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
Raphael, D., Renwick, R., Brown, I. and Rootman, I. (1996). Quality of Life Indicators and Health: Current Status and Emerging Conceptions. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 39 No 1, pp: 65-88
Rimmer, P.J. (1986). Rikisha to Rapid Transit: Urban Public Transport Systems and Policy in Southeast Asia. Sydney: Pergamon Press
Simon, D. (1996). Transport and Development in the Third World. New York, London
Spencer, A. H. and Madhavan, S. (1989). The Car in Southeast Asia. Transportation Research A 23(A), pp: 425-437
Steg, Linda, (2003). Can Public Transport Compete with the Private Car? IATSS Research, Vol. 27 (2), pp: 27-35
Steg, Linda and Gifford, R. (2005). Sustainable Transportation and Quality of Life. Journal of Transport Geography Vol. 13, pp: 59-69
Union Internationale des Transports Public Secretary General (2002). Public Transport and Car-Sharing: Together for the Better. In workshop on Public Transport and Car-Sharing: Together for the Better, Bremen, 4-5 December
Yap, S. H. (2005). Malaysian Quality of Life. Sambutan Hari Perancangan Bandar Sedunia 2005, Planning Towards Liveable Cities, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
City of San Antonio. Working Family Vehicle Purchase Program, Retrieved May 2009, from http://www.sanantonio.org
Department of Statistics, Malaysia. Retrieved December 2008, from http://www. statistics.go v. my
Malaysia’s Road Transport Department. Retrieved December 2008, from http://portal.jpj.gov.my/v5/index.php/ms/statistik
MIROS. Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research, Retrieved May 2009, from http://miros.gov. my
Royal Malaysian Police. Retrieved February 2009, from http://www.rmp.gov.my
Quality of Life ’07 in Twelve New Zealand Cities. Retrieved February 2009, from http://www. bigci ties. govt, nz
Road Transport Department, Malaysia. New Registered Car and
Motorcycle by State and Year, Malaysia. Retrieved December 2008, from http://portal.jpj.gov.my/v5/index.php/ms/statistik
Vehicles for Change, Retrieved May 2009, from http://www.vehiclesforchange.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.