A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON THE DOCTRINE OF PRIVITY TO CIRCUMVENT ITS EFFECT ON SUBCONTRACTOR’S PAYMENT CLAIM

Authors

  • See Zhi Yan Center for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Mohd Suhaimi Mohd-Danuri Centre for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Noorfajri Ismail Faculty of Syariah and Law, UNIVERSITI SAINS ISLAM MALAYSIA
  • Othman Mohamed Center for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Fadzida Ismail Faculty of Industrial Management, UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i29.1353

Keywords:

construction contract, doctrine of privity, subcontractor’s payment claim, law of contract, legal mechanism

Abstract

In common law jurisdictions, the doctrine of privity has been criticised by the judiciary and academic commentators, particularly the second rule of doctrine, which states that a person who is not a party to the contract cannot sue on it to obtain promised performance, although the contract has been formed with the intention to benefit him. In certain circumstances, this rule may produce unfair and injustice result to the third party of a contract, as it prohibits the third party from enforcing the right to get benefits conferred on them. The doctrine of privity becomes relevant in the context of tendering procedures when subcontractors, who are not direct parties to the main construction contract, are involved. Hence, the aim of this paper is two-fold: to highlight the difficulties of the existing legal mechanism associated with privity rule and to suggest possible ways to circumvent the effect of the doctrine of privity on subcontractors’ payment claims in the Malaysian construction industry. By adopting the socio legal research approach, the impact of the doctrine of privity, the difficulties of the existing legal mechanisms, and the need for a possible law reform were examined. The findings were also validated by conducting semi-structured interviews with five construction law experts. Among others, the findings showed that enhancement to the existing legal mechanisms and statutory intervention can effectively circumvent the privity rule and protect the subcontractor’s right for the payment claim.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrew, K. & Les, R. (2008). Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment. New York, NY: Wiley Blackwell

Anida, M. (2013). The need for legislative reform of the privity doctrine in commercial contracts in Malaysia: A comparative analysis. National University of Malaysia, Malaysia. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/64243/1/Anida_Mahmood_Thesis.pdf

Asmadi Mohd Angsor & Nazir Adi. (2020). The doctrine of promissory estoppel: As a shield or sword?. Research in Management of Technology and Business, 1(1), 918-925. Retrieved from https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/periodicals/index.php/rmtb/article/view/530

Chynoweth, P. (2008). Legal research. In A. Knight & L. Ruddock (Eds.), Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment. Singapore Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Goode, R. M. (1990). Principles of Corporate Insolvency Law. London, United Kingdom: Sweet & Maxwell.

Haron, R. C. & Arazmi, A. L. (2020). Late payment issues of subcontractors in Malaysian Construction Industry. Planning Malaysia Journal, 18(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i11.711

Jimmie, H. & Andrew, T. (1994). The Contractor‐Subcontractor Relationship: The Subcontractor's View. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 120(2), 274-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:2(274)

Kiu, M. S., Chia, F. C. & Wong, P. F. (2022). Exploring the potentials of blockchain application in construction industry: a systematic review. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(15), 2931-2940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1833436

Lee, K. H., Gan, S. Y., Mohd Danuri, M. S. & Zolkafli, U. K. (2020). Critical analysis of “Doctrine of Privity” in Malaysian construction industry. Malaysian Construction Research Journal, 9(1), 103-113.

Lee, S. (2019). Case Update: Federal Court Decides That Retention Sum in A Construction Contract is Not Held on Trust. Retrieved from https://themalaysianlawyer.com/2019/03/25/case-update-retention-sum-in-a-construction-contract-is-not-held-on-trust/

Mason, L. (2015). Enforcing contracts for the benefit of third parties: Recent reform of the doctrine of privity. Hong Kong Law Journal, 45(1), 13-28.

Mante, J. (2021). Understanding legal research in the built environment. In E. Manu & J. Akotia (Eds.), Secondary Research Methods in the Built Environment. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003000532

Mccrudden, C. (2006). Legal research and the social sciences. The Law Quarterly Review.

McKendrick, E. (2000). Contract Law (Palgrave Law Masters). (4th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.

M-Suaree, N. A. S., Syed Abdul Kader, S. Z., Mohamed-Osman, M., Abdul-Manaf, Z. (2022). The Development Of Policy And Legal Framework For Social Impact Assessment In Malaysia. Planning Malaysia Journal, 20(3), p.295-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i22.1146

Ng, S. H. (2006). Legal position of the issues associated with main contractor’s insolvency. University Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/2358/1/NgSockHooiMFAB2006.pdf

Orange, L. and Tree, J. (2014). Australia: Subcontractor's Charges Act - An (old) friend or foe? Retrieved from https://www.mondaq.com/australia/construction-planning/327438/subcontractor39s-charges-act--an-old-friend-or-foe

Poole, J. (2006). Textbook on Contract Law. (8th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Reza, N., Seyyed, S. & Mansour, A.A. (2019). Assignment of contract in forward sale of building Act. Private Law Research, 8(28), 285-308. Retrieved from https://jplr.atu.ac.ir/article_10476_en.html

Robert, K.Y. (2016). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.

Rosley Sarah, Nazri Amalina, Ramlan Amalina & Ahmad Yossry. (2014). Selected issues on the law of trust: a comparative study of judicial attitudes in Malaysia and United Kingdom. University Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. Retrieved from https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31855

Seifi, Z. G. & Javad, P. (2018). Suspension in collateral contract. Journal of Law Research, 21(82), 205-226. Retrieved from https://lawresearchmagazine.sbu.ac.ir/article_58176.html

Tan, P. M. (2009). Circumventing the privity rule in Malaysia. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 4(4). Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/28704-EN-circumventing-the-privity-rule-in-malaysia.pdf

Wan Azlina Binti Ibrahim. (2016). Regulatory framework for adjudicators in the Malaysian construction industry. University of Strathclyde, Scotland. Retrieved from https://stax.strath.ac.uk/downloads/1544bp28w

Downloads

Published

2023-09-28

How to Cite

Yan, S. Z., Mohd-Danuri, M. S., Ismail, N., Mohamed, O., & Ismail, F. (2023). A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON THE DOCTRINE OF PRIVITY TO CIRCUMVENT ITS EFFECT ON SUBCONTRACTOR’S PAYMENT CLAIM. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21(29). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i29.1353

Issue

Vol. 21 (2023): PLANNING MALAYSIA JOURNAL : Volume 21, Issue 5, 2023

Section

Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.

Copyright & Creative Commons Licence

eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.

Most read articles by the same author(s)