A PRELIMINARY FRAMEWORK FOR PREVENTING DISPUTES IN DIFFERENT STAGES OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Authors

  • Nur Nadhirah Muhammuddin Center for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Mohd Suhaimi Mohd-Danuri Center for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Mahanim Hanid Center for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, UNIVERSITI MALAYA
  • Fadzida Ismail Faculty of Industrial Management, UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG
  • Mohd Nasrun Mohd Nawi School of Technology Management and Logistics, UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i29.1370

Keywords:

building construction projects, disputes, minimising, strategy

Abstract

The upward trend of dispute claims and occurrences throughout different stages has detrimentally affected the outcomes of construction projects. Building upon two major themes from a systematic literature review (SLR) study, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to further group the extensive causes and strategies into several meaningful groups using the Statistical Social Package Science (SPSS) software. Questionnaires were used and issued to three main stakeholders (clients, consultants, and contractors) in the Klang Valley area. This paper presents the PCA findings, which have led to the development of a framework to prevent disputes in different stages of building construction projects. The PCA findings have narrowed down the major contributors of disputes to “Contract-related causes” and “Time-related causes”. PCA analysis has also shown that the three key themes of “Quality-related strategies,” “Business relationship-related strategies,” and “Productivity-related strategies” were the most effective ways to reduce disagreements. It is important to highlight that the findings related to the causes of disputes during the planning stage consistently align with those of a prior study. This underscores the importance of ethical conduct, particularly during the planning phase and, more specifically, within the tendering process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adegbembo, T. F., Awodele, O., & Oke, A. (2020). A principal component analysis of knowledge management success factors in construction firms in Nigeria. Journal of Construction Project Management and Innovation, 10(1), 42-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36615/jcpmi.v10i1.346

Assaf, S., Hassanain, M.A., Abdallah, A., Sayed, A. M. Z., & Alsharani, A. (2019). Significant causes of claims and disputes in construction projects in Saudi Arabia. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(5), 597-615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-09-2018-0113

Ayudhya, B. I. N. (2011). Common dispute related to public work projects in Thailand. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 33(5), 565-573.

Cakmak, E., & Cakmak, P. I. (2014). An analysis of causes of disputes in the construction industry using analytical network process. Procedia-Social and Behavorial Sciences, 109, 183-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.441

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). Routledge Publishers, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053

Dogbegah, R., Owusu-Manu, D, & Omoteso, K. (2011). A principal component analysis of project management competencies for the Ghanaian construction industry, Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 11(1), 26-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v11i1.1680

Elhag, T, Eapen, S., & Ballal, T. (2019). Moderating claims and disputes through collaborative procurement. Construction Innovation, 20(1), 79-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-02-2019-0020

El-Sayegh, S., Ahmad, I., Aljanabi, M., Herzallah, R., Metry, S. & El-Ashwal, O. (2020). Construction disputes in the UAE: Causes and resolution methods. Buildings, 10(171), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10100171

Field, A. (2005) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 2nd ed., Sage, London.

Hadi, N. U., Abdulah, N., & Sentosa, I. (2016). An easy approach to exploratory factor analysis: Marketing perspective. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(1), 215-223.

Ismail, F., Mohd Danuri, M.S., Mohamed, O., Abd-Karim, S.B. and Mohd Nawi, M.N. (2017). Ethics-Related Issues in the Tender Evaluation of Malaysia Public Projects. Journal of Design and Built Environment, Special Issue 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.sp2017no1.14

Karji, A., Namian, M., & Tafazzoli, M. (2020). Identifying the key barriers to promote sustainable construction in the United States: A principal component analysis. Sustainability, 12, 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125088

Kissi, E., Boateng, E. B., Adjei-Kumi, T., & Badu, E. (2017). Principal component analysis of challenges facing the implementation of value engineering in public projects in developing countries. International Journal of Construction Management, 17(2), 142-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1233088

Mahamid, I. (2016). Micro and macro level of dispute causes in residential building projects: Studies of Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University, 28, 12-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2014.03.002

Mohd-Nordin, R., Mohd-Ahnuar, E., Nasid-Masrom, M. A, Ameer-Ali, N. (2023). Examining Corruption Issues In Malaysia Construction Industry: Partaker Perspectives. Planning Malaysia: Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, Vol. 21(2), 52-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i26.1259

Muhammuddin, N. N., Mohd-Danuri, M. S. and Hanid, M. (2022). Dispute Occurrences During Construction Stages of Building Project: A Systematic Literature Review, Journal of Project Management and Practice, Vol. 2(1), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/jpmp.vol2no2.1

Mukilan, K., BalaNivetha, M., Velumani, P., & Christopher, G., S. (2019). A qualitative study and analysis of causes and disputes in claims in construction industry. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(1), 951-957.

Obeng-Ahenkora, N. K., & Danso, H. (2018). Principal component analysis of factors influencing pricing decisions of building materials in Ghana. International Journal of Construction Management, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1484553

Omaraka, A. E. (2020). A principal component analysis of supply chain management skills for the Nigerian construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 1-10. Doi: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1797984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1797984

Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS Survival Manual. A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS, 4th edition. Allen & Unwin. Retrieved from: www.allenandunwin.com/spss

PMI. Project Management Institute. (2017), A guide to the project management body of knowledge PMBOK guide. 6th ed. Newton Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute, Inc.

Saar, C. C., Chuing, L. S., Hai, T. K., Yusof, A. M. (2017). Modelling dispute management in construction industry, Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering 29 Special Issue, 1, 1-14.

Sakyiama, E. (2016). Managing discords, disputes and conflicts in the Ghanaian construction industry: An empirical examination of traditional procurement of assembly projects. [Master dissertation, University of Education, Winneba].

Soni, S., Pandey, M., & Agrawal, S. (2017). Conflicts and disputes in construction projects: An overview. International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 7(6), 40-42. Treacy, D., Spillane, J. P., & Tansey, P. (2015). Construction disputes in small to medium enterprises in Ireland during recession. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 8(1), 21-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-10-2014-0031

Downloads

Published

2023-09-28

How to Cite

Muhammuddin, N. N., Mohd-Danuri, M. S., Hanid, M., Ismail, F., & Mohd Nawi, M. N. (2023). A PRELIMINARY FRAMEWORK FOR PREVENTING DISPUTES IN DIFFERENT STAGES OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21(29). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i29.1370

Most read articles by the same author(s)