A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON THE FACTORS INFLUENCING SOCIAL COHESION IN MUSCAT, OMAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i34.1637Keywords:
Social cohesion, Physical factors, Muscat, Social sustainability, Smart cityAbstract
Social cohesion, which refers to connectedness and solidarity among groups in society, is crucial to achieving an inclusive and sustainable development. However, social cohesion is influenced by various factors that can be either physical or non-physical. Given the limited studies on promoting social cohesion in Oman, this research adopts a qualitative approach to identify those urban physical factors that influence social cohesion in the governorate of Muscat. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with 12 experts in relevant fields in Oman. By reviewing government initiatives aimed at enhancing social cohesion, this study highlights the importance of health and education infrastructure, community and open spaces, affordable housing, and walkable neighborhoods in promoting social interaction and cohesion. Through a thematic analysis, this study identified 31 codes and 8 themes, namely, 1) land use and connectivity, 2) community and open spaces, 3) activity centers, 4) affordable housing, 5) access to facilities, 6) porous boundaries, 7) health and education infrastructure, and 8) walkable neighborhoods. The findings of this study provide nuanced insights into the interplay between social cohesion and urban physical factors and offer valuable perspectives for policymakers, urban planners, and stakeholders involved in sustainable urban development in Muscat.
Downloads
References
Al-Barwani, T. A., & Albeely, T. S. (2013). The Omani family: Strengths and challenges. In Taylor and Francis Ltd 5 (Vol. 41, Issues 1–2, pp. 119–142). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v41n01_07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v41n01_07
Al-Hinai, A. M. Z., Ejohwomu, O., & Abadi, M. (2024). Developing a social value model for Oman’s national infrastructure planning: a hermeneutical approach. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 9(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2023.2280741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2023.2280741
Alatas, S. F. (2006). A Khaldunian exemplar for a historical sociology for the south. Current Sociology, 54(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392106063189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392106063189
Alipour, S. M. H., & Galal Ahmed, K. (2021). Assessing the effect of urban form on social sustainability: a proposed ‘Integrated Measuring Tools Method’ for urban neighborhoods in Dubai. City, Territory and Architecture, 8(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-020-00129-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-020-00129-4
Amoatey, P., Omidvarborna, H., Baawain, M. S., & Al-Mamun, A. (2020). Evaluation of vehicular pollution levels using line source model for hot spots in Muscat, Oman. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(25), 31184–31201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09215-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09215-z
Appolloni, L., Corazza, M. V., & D’Alessandro, D. (2019). The pleasure of walking: An innovative methodology to assess appropriate walkable performance in urban areas to support transport planning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(12), 3467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123467
Bramley, G., & Power, S. (2009). Urban form and social sustainability: The role of density and housing type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b33129
Castanho Silva, B. (2015). The Politics of Social Cohesion in Germany, France and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 2(3–4), 368–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2015.1108855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2015.1108855
Chen, X., Marzbali, M. H., & Abdullah, A. (2024). Landscape attractiveness and place identity: Considering the role of urban parks. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i33.1537
Clarke, M., Cadaval, S., Wallace, C., Anderson, E., Egerer, M., Dinkins, L., & Platero, R. (2023). Factors that enhance or hinder social cohesion in urban greenspaces: A literature review. In Urban Forestry and Urban Greening (Vol. 84, p. 127936). Urban & Fischer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127936
D’Orso, G., & Migliore, M. (2020). A GIS-based method for evaluating the walkability of a pedestrian environment and prioritised investments. Journal of Transport Geography, 82, 102555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102555
Dempsey, N., Brown, C., Raman, S., Porta, S., Jenks, M., Jones, C., & Bramley, G. (2008). Elements of Urban Form (pp. 21–51). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8647-2_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8647-2_2
Dragolov, G., Ignácz, Z. S., Lorenz, J., Delhey, J., Boehnke, K., & Unzicker, K. (2016). Theoretical Framework of the Social Cohesion Radar (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32464-7_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32464-7_1
Durkheim, É. (1922). De la division du travail social. F. Alcan, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203786703-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203786703-2
Fonseca, F., Fernandes, E., & Ramos, R. (2022). Walkable Cities: Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimarães, Portugal. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(16), 10306. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610306
Fonseca, X., Lukosch, S., & Brazier, F. (2019). Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(2), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480
Hassan, F. (2006). Ibn Khaldun and Jane Addams: The Real Father of Sociology and the Mother of Social Works. Madrid, November, 1–23. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=4b7d142f1538197a07d0654843b3758ec30bd57c
Henderson, H., Child, S., Moore, S., Moore, J. B., & Kaczynski, A. T. (2016). The Influence of Neighborhood Aesthetics, Safety, and Social Cohesion on Perceived Stress in Disadvantaged Communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 58(1–2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12081
Kapoor, K., Weerakkody, V., & Schroeder, A. (2018). Social innovations for social cohesion in Western Europe: success dimensions for lifelong learning and education. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 31(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1419336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1419336
Kurtenbach, S. (2024). Neighbourhoods and Social Cohesion: Why Neighbourhoods Still Matter. Built Environment, 50(1), 73–94. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/alex/benv/2024/00000050/00000001/art00007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.50.1.73
Lalot, F., Abrams, D., Broadwood, J., Davies Hayon, K., & Platts-Dunn, I. (2022). The social cohesion investment: Communities that invested in integration programmes are showing greater social cohesion in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 32(3), 536–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2522
Landorf, C. (2011). Evaluating social sustainability in historic urban environments. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 17(5), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.563788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.563788
Larimian, T., Freeman, C., Palaiologou, F., & Sadeghi, N. (2020). Urban social sustainability at the neighbourhood scale: measurement and the impact of physical and personal factors. 25(10), 747–764. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13549839.2020.1829575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2020.1829575
Mac Fadden, I., Santana, M., Vázquez-Cano, E., & López-Meneses, E. (2021). A science mapping analysis of ‘marginality, stigmatization and social cohesion’ in WoS (1963–2019). Quality and Quantity, 55(1), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01004-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01004-7
Moustakas, L. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Social Cohesion from 1994–2020. Publications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10010005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10010005
Moustakas, L. (2023). Social Cohesion: Definitions, Causes and Consequences. Encyclopedia, 3(3), 1028–1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3030075
National Center for Statistics and Information. Sultanate of Oman. (2020). Oman census 2020. https://www.ncsi.gov.om/Pages/AllIndicators.aspx
Samat, N., Tilaki, M. J. M., & Rahim, A. A. (2024). Assessing the Impact of Inequalities on Residents'perception and Crime Incidents in Urban and Peri-Urban Neighbourhoods. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i33.1533
Oman’s Ministry of Economy. (2020). Oman vision 2040. In Oman’s Ministry of Economy. www.2040.om
Schiefer, D., & van der Noll, J. (2017). The Essentials of Social Cohesion: A Literature Review. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1314-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1314-5
Scholz, W. ;, & Langer, S. (2019). Spatial Development of Muscat/ Oman and Challenges of Public Transport. 40–67. https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-B-000339862
Shirazi, M. R., & Keivani, R. (2018). The triad of social sustainability: Defining and measuring social sustainability of urban neighbourhoods. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1469039, 12(4), 448–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1469039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1469039
Sugandha, Freestone, R., & Favaro, P. (2022). The social sustainability of smart cities: A conceptual framework. City, Culture and Society, 29, 100460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2022.100460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2022.100460
The education council, S. of O. (2018). The National Strategy for Education 2040. https://www.educouncil.gov.om/downloads/Ts775SPNmXDQ.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
