SERVICE CATCHMENT OF MASS RAPID TRANSIT (MRT) FEEDER BUS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF T461 ROUTE TAMAN KAJANG UTAMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v17i10.630Keywords:
Feeder bus, service catchment, urban rail transitAbstract
The planning and development of rail services require various considerations. Land availability, land use, catchment, route matching, infrastructure fitting, barrier free and micro-climate friendly designs are some of the factors heeded prior to such installations. A deviation between designated and highly demanded service area in urban sprawl zones of the city has been occurring in many Malaysian cities. These gaps have led to the mismatch between origin/destination of passengers and planned locations of train stations and its feeder bus stops. As such, rail services become less accessible to populations with the highest demands. This paper discusses the preliminary findings from a pilot study which seeks to calibrate the research instrument and validate preliminary findings before actual data collection for the purpose of determining the service catchment of the T461 feeder bus in Kajang MRT Station. The Garmin GPS device acts as the research instrument to obtain coordinates of locations where passengers board and alight feeder buses. On-board surveys and comparison analyses are methods that have been used to obtain the optimum GPS coordinates of the bus stop locations. The preliminary findings indicate that the research instrument is ready to be used for actual data collection and geospatial analysis to determine the service catchment of the T461 feeder bus service.Downloads
References
Active Healthy Communities. (2014). PedShed analysis. Retrieved from
http://www.activehealthycommunities.com.au/plan/gis-analysis/walkingcycling-pedshed-analysis/
Advani, M., & Tiwari, G. (2006). Review of capacity improvement strategies for bus transit service. Indian Journal of Transport Management, 30(4), 363-391.
Almasi, M. H., Mounes, S. M., Koting, S., & Karim, M. R. (2014). Analysis of feeder bus network design and scheduling problems. The Scientific World Journal, Article ID 408473.
Almasi, M. H., Sadollah, A., Oh, Y., Kim, D., & Kang, S. (2018). Optimal coordination strategy for an integrated multimodal transit feeder network design considering multiple objectives. Sustainability 2018, 10, 734.
Asfour, O. S., & Zourob, N. (2017). The neighbourhood unit adequacy: An analysis of the case of Gaza, Palestine. Cities, 69, 1-11.
Azmi, D. I., & Karim, H. A. (2012). A comparative study of walking behavior to community facilities in low-cost and medium cost housing. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 619-628.
Ciaffi, F., Cipriani, E., & Petrelli, M. (2012). Feeder bus network design problem : A new metaheuristic procedure and real size applications. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 798-807.
El-Geneidy, A., Grimsrud, M., Wasfi, R., Tétreault, P., & Surprenant-Legault, J. (2014). New evidence on walking distances to transit stops: Identifying redundancies and gaps using variable service areas. Transportation, 41(1), 193-210.
Hayashi, Y., Doi, K., Yagishita, M., & Kuwata, M. (2004). Urban transport sustainability: Asian trends, problems and policy practices. EJTIR, 4(1), 27-45.
Huang, Z. D, Liu, X. J., Huang, C. C., & Shen, J. W. (2010). A GIS-based framework for bus network optimization using genetic algorithm. Annals of GIS, 16(3), 185-194.
Johar, A., Jain, S. S., Garg, P. K., & Gundaliya, P. J. (2015). A study for commuter walk distance from bus stops to different destination along routes in Delhi. European Transport, 59(3), (n.p.).
Khalid, N. S. (n.d.). Human walking behaviour to open spaces. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/9714659/HUMAN_WALKING_BEHAVIOUR_T
O_OPEN_SPACES
Lovett, A., Haynes, R., Sünnenberg, G., & Gale, S. (2002). Car travel time and
accessibility by bus to general practitioner services: A study using patient
registers and GIS. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 97-111.
LeGates, R. T., & Stout, F. (Eds.). 1943- (2011). The city reader (5th ed). London: Routledge.
Meenakshi. (2011). Neighborhood unit and its conceptualization in the contemporary urban context. Institute of Town Planners, India Journal 8(3), 81-87.
New Zealand, Auckland Council. (2010). New Lynn Urban Plan 2010-2030. Retrieved from https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/plans-projects-policies-reportsbylaws/our-plans-strategies/place-based-plans/docsnewlynnurbanplan/newlynn-urban-plan-2010-part-1.pdf
O’Connor, D., & Caulfield, B. (2017). Level of service and the transit neighbourhood – observations from Dublin city and suburbs. In 15th International Conference Series on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport. Stockholm, Sweden.
Olszewski, P., & Wibowo, S. (2005). Using equivalent walking distance to assess pedestrian accessibility to transit stations in Singapore. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1927, 38-45.
Pongprasert, P., & Kubota, H. (2017). Switching from motorcycle taxi to walking: A case study of transit station access in Bangkok, Thailand. International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences; 41(4), 182-190.
Salvo, G., & Sabatini, S. (2014). A GIS approach to evaluate bus stop accessibility. Advanced OR and AI Methods in Transportation. Retrieved from
http://www.iasi.cnr.it/ewgt/ 16conference/ID108.pdf.
Shi, Y., Blainey, S., & Hounsell, N. (2017). Using GIS to assess the potential for centralised planning of bus networks. Transportation Planning and Technology, 40(1), 119-142.
Sukor, N. S., & Fisal, S. F. (2018). Factors influencing the willingness to walk to the bus stops in Penang Island. Planning Malaysia, 16(1), 193-204.
Vuchic, v. R. (2005). Urban transit: Operations, planning and economics. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.