A PARADOXICAL PROPOSITION OF CONNECTEDNESS TO NATURE, RECYCLING BEHAVIOUR AND PSYCHOLOGICAL RESTORATION RELATIONSHIP IN URBAN PARK CONTEXT: A PATH ANALYSIS EVIDENCE

Authors

  • Mohd Zahid Mohd Salleh Centre of Studies for Postgraduate, Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, SHAH ALAM, MALAYSIA
  • Noriah Othman Centre of Studies for Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, PUNCAK ALAM, MALAYSIA
  • Nurhayati Abd Malek Centre of Studies for Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, PUNCAK ALAM, MALAYSIA
  • Leny Suzana Suddin Department of Public Health Medicine, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, SUNGAI BULOH, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i20.1082

Keywords:

Connectedness to nature, pro-environmental behaviour, psychological restoration, urban park

Abstract

About 29.2% of Malaysians have been diagnosed with psychological distress, especially young adults. The B40 low-income group is most afflicted due to financial restrictions and limiting access to medication. Therefore, urban parks’ connectedness and pro-environmental behaviour towards psychological restoration are inexpensive ways to alleviate distress. This study examines the relationship between Connectedness to Nature (CN), Pro-Environmental Behaviour (PEB), and Psychological Restoration (PR). Three hypotheses were used to create a structural model to guide the cross-sectional methodology used for the study. A total of 161 students responded to the Google Form questionnaire. SPSS v21 and Smart-PLS 3.2.7 were used to examine the model relationship. The results showed that all hypotheses were supported by substantial statistical evidence. This study provides an important direction to motivate people to utilize urban parks for obtaining psychological restoration benefits costeffectively. Green behaviour is also beneficial for humans and the environment in promoting healthy living.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barrera-Hernández, L. F., Sotelo-Castillo, M. A., Echeverría-Castro, S. B., & TapiaFonllem, C. O. (2020). Connectedness to Nature: Its Impact on Sustainable Behaviours and Happiness in Children. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(276), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00276

Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and Opinions on Structural Equation Modelling. MIS Quarterly, 22, 7-16.

Cohen, J. (1989). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Darlington, R. B., & Hayes, A. F. (2017). Regression analysis and linear models. New York, NY: Guilford.

Deng, L., Li, X., Luo, H., Fu, E. K., Ma, J., Sun, L. X., & Jia, Y. (2020). Empirical Study of Landscape Types, Landscape Elements and Landscape Components of the Urban Park Promoting Physiological and Psychological Restoration. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 48, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126488

Donnelly, G. E., Lamberton, C., Walker Reczek, R., & Norton, M. I. (2017). Social Recycling Transforms Unwanted Goods into Happiness. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1086/689866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/689866

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Gao, T., Zhang, T., Zhu, L., Gao, Y., & Qiu, L. (2019). Exploring Psychophysiological Restoration and Individual Preference in the Different Environments Based on Virtual Reality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3102), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173102

Geisser, S. (1974). A Predictive Approach to the Random Effects Model. Biometrika. 61(1): 101-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.101

Giovanis, E. (2014). Relationship Between Well-Being and Recycling Rates: Evidence from Life Satisfaction Approach in Britain. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2014.883941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2014.883941

Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K.O. (2017). Mirror, Mirror On the Wall: A Comparative Evaluation of Composite-Based Structural Equation Modelling Methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 616–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x

Hsiao, H. Y., Hsu, C. T., Chen, L., Wu, J., Chang, P. S., Lin, C. L., & Lin, T. K. (2020). Environmental Volunteerism for Social Good: A Longitudinal Study of Older Adults’ Health. Research on Social Work Practice, 30(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731519892620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731519892620

Ibáñez-Rueda, N., Guillén-Royo, M., & Guardiola, J. (2020). Pro-Environmental Behaviour, Connectedness to Nature and Well-Being Dimensions Among Granada Students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219171

Illia Ibrahim, F., Omar, D., & Hanita Nik Mohamad, N. (2018). Multi-dimensional human interaction in open spaces. Journal of the Malaysia Institute of Planners, 16(3), 297–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v16.i7.519

Joy, L. K., Ramachandran, M., & George, S. (2021). Learned Helplessness, Psychological Wellbeing, and Pro-Environment Care Behaviour among Victims of Frequent Floods in Kerala. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice, 12(1), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721566

Krazy, I. V. (2019). The Positive Effect of Connectedness to Nature on Psychological Well-Being: The Significance of Trust as a Mediator. Psychology, Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 16(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2019-1-27-49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2019-1-27-49

Malek, N. A., & Nashar, A. (2020). Do Duration of Stay and Park Visitation Matter? An Evaluation of Park Distance. Journal of the Malaysia Institute of Planners, 18(1), 148–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i11.716

Martin, L., White, M. P., Hunt, A., Richardson, M., Pahl, S., & Burt, J. (2020). Nature Contact, Nature Connectedness and Associations with Health, Well-Being, And Pro-Environmental Behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68(101389), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389

Othman, N., Mohd Salleh, M. Z., Abdul Malek, N., & Suddin, L. S. (2020). An Overview of Psychological Restoration in Urban Environment: Integration of ProEnvironmental Theory into Neuro-Landscape Study. Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies, 5(16), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v5i16.349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v5i16.349

Panno, A., Theodorou, A., Carrus, G., Imperatori, C., Spano, G., & Sanesi, G. (2020). Nature reappraisers, benefits for the environment: a model linking cognitive reappraisal, the “being away” dimension of restorativeness and eco-friendly behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01986

Rita, B., & Giuseppe, B. (2017). How the Psychological Benefits Associated with Exposure to Nature Can Affect Pro-Environmental Behaviour? Annals of Cognitive Science, 1(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.36959/447/336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36959/447/336

Schebella, M. F., Weber, D., Schultz, L., & Weinstein, P. (2019). The Wellbeing Benefits Associated with Perceived and Measured Biodiversity in Australian Urban Green Spaces. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(802), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030802

Sulphey, M. M., & Faisal, S. (2021). Connectedness to Nature and Environmental Concern as Antecedents of Commitment to Environmental Sustainability. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(2), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10803

Stone, M. (1974). Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36(2), 111-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x

Sun, M., & Trudel, R. (2017). The Effect of Recycling Versus Trashing On Consumption: Theory and Experimental Evidence. Journal of Marketing Research. 54(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0574

Wang, X., Rodiek, S., Wu, C., Chen, Y., & Li, Y. (2016). Stress Recovery and Restorative Effects of Viewing Different Urban Park Scenes in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 15, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.003

Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS Path Modelling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly, 177-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284

Whitburn, J., Linklater, W. L., & Milfont, T. L. (2019). Exposure to Urban Nature and Tree Planting Are Related to Pro-Environmental Behaviour via Connection to Nature, the Use of Nature for Psychological Restoration, and Environmental Attitudes. Environment and Behaviour, 51(7), 787–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517751009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517751009

Downloads

Published

2022-04-18

How to Cite

Mohd Salleh, M. Z., Othman, N., Abd Malek, N., & Suddin, L. S. (2022). A PARADOXICAL PROPOSITION OF CONNECTEDNESS TO NATURE, RECYCLING BEHAVIOUR AND PSYCHOLOGICAL RESTORATION RELATIONSHIP IN URBAN PARK CONTEXT: A PATH ANALYSIS EVIDENCE. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 20(20). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v20i20.1082

Most read articles by the same author(s)