THE FUNCTIONS OF LANDSCAPE IN SCHOOL LEARNING PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i14.826Keywords:
Landscape functions, assisting the learning process, landscaping components, Klang Valley-LangatAbstract
This article seeks to identify the function of the schools’ landscapes in the learning process. For this study, primary data were collected through field observations using a checklist. 104 schools within the Klang Valley-Langat area were randomly selected. Structured interview sessions were conducted with school managers and secondary data were obtained from various agencies. Results showed that the function of landscapes in assisting learning was at a high score (47.1%). Scores of rural schools were at 51.6 percent ahead of urban schools (45.2 %). There was a significant relationship between the function of landscapes assisting in the learning process and academic achievement at the school level at 0.01 with a Chi-square value of 35.993. Pearson product-moment correlation test results showed a significant correlation in weak and moderate levels of landscape functions assisting in the process of learning and academic achievements. This proved that the landscape had an important role in the learning process. It is hoped that this study will create awareness among the school’s community.Downloads
References
Akbari, H., & Taha, H. (1992). The impact of trees and white surfaces on residential heating and cooling energy use in four Canadian cities. Energy, 17(2), 141-149.
Alamah Misni. (2013). Modifying the Outdoor Temperature around Single-Family Residences: The influence of landscaping. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 664-673.
Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19, 1207.
Chawla, L., Keena, K., Pevec, I., & Stanley, E. (2014). Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence. Health Place, 28, 1-13.
Clevenger, K. A., Wierenga, M. J., Howe, C. A., & Pfeiffer, K. A. (2020). A systematic review of child and adolescent physical activity by schoolyard location. Kinesiology Review, 9(2), 147-158.
Cody, B., & Heather, A. S. (2017). Green urban landscapes and school-level academic performance. Landscape and Urban Planning, 160, 16-27.
Dowdell, K., Gray, T., & Malone, K. (2011). Nature and its influence on children’s outdoor play. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 15(2), 24-35.
Dyment, J. E., & Bell, A. C. (2007). Active by design: Promoting physical activity through school ground greening. Children's Geographies, 5(4), 463-477.
Guilford, (1956). Fundamental statistic in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182.
Kaplan, S., & Berman, M. G. (2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 43-57.
Katiman Rostam. (2006). Migrasi ke kawasan pinggiran Wilayah Metropolitan Lembah Klang. Akademika, 68, 3-27.
Katiman Rostam, Mochamad Rosul., Er, A. C., Abdul Rahim Mohd Nor, Zaini Sakawi., Norazuan Md. Hashim, & Aishah@Esah Hj. Muhammad. (2010). Pembandaran dan rebakan bandar di pinggir Wilayah Metropolitan Klang-Langat. Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 6(2), 37-50.
Ke-Tsung, H. (2009). Influence of limitedly visible leafy indoor plants on the psychology, behavior, and health of students at a junior high school in Taiwan. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 658-692.
Kelz, C., Evans, G., & Röderer, K. (2013). The restorative effects of redesigning the schoolyard: A multi-methodological, quasi-experimental study in rural Austrian middle schools. Environment and Behavior, 47, 119-139.
Kopeva, A., Khrapko, O., & Ivanova, O. (2017). Landscape planning of schoolyards. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 262, 012145 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/262/1/012145.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Lanza, K., Alcazar, M., Hoelscher, D. M., Kohl III, H. W. (2020). Effects of trees, gardens, and trails on heat index and child health: Design and methods of the Green Schoolyards Project. Research Square, 1-17.
Loebach, J., & Gilliland, J. (2014). Free Range Kids? Using GPS-Derived Activity Spaces to Examine Children’s Neighborhood Activity and Mobility. Environment and Behavior, 48, 421-453.
Moogk-Soulis, C. (2002). Schoolyard heat islands: A case study in Waterloo, Ontario. Proceedings from Canadian Urban Forest Conference, 1-7. Retrieved from http://www.tcf-fca.ca/cufc5/papers/Moogk-Soulis.pdf.
Paddl, E., & Gillil, J. (2016). Orange is the new green: Exploring the restorative capacity of seasonal foliage in schoolyard trees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(5), 497.
Robert, D. B., & Robert, C. C. (2020). Evidence-based landscape architecture for human health and well-Being. Sustainability, 12(4), 1360, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041360.
Rohhayati, N. (2008). Student perception of school landscape and its influence on learning experience at the award-winning secondary school in Kelantan, Malaysia. (Unpublished Master Thesis.) Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Salina, M. A., Katiman, R., & Hair, A. A. (2014). Characteristics of landscape and surrounding qualities of schools in Klang Valley. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(6), 61.
The Federal Territory Development and the Klang Valley Planning Division. (2004). Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-location-of-the-Klang-Valley-in-Peninsular-Malaysia-Source-The-Federal- Territory_fig1_270706854.
Van Dijk-Wesselius, J. E., Maas, J., Hovinga, D., Van Vugt, M. V. D. B. A., & Van den Berg, A. E. (2018). The impact of greening schoolyards on the appreciation, and physical, cognitive and social-emotional well-being of schoolchildren: A prospective intervention study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, 15-26.
Zaleha Abdullah (2014). Activity theory as analytical tool: A case study of developing student teachers’ creativity in design. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131, 70-84.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.