THE POTENTIAL OF URBAN FOREST PARK FOR SUSTAINABLE CITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v10i3.101Keywords:
urban forest, urban park, city sustainability, environmental evaluationAbstract
The potential of Urban Forest Park and publics' views are clearly pertinent in urban greening and sustainability, yet they are often ignored by certain countries. In line with this, the Town and Country Planning Department and National Landscape Department had taken steps by developing more urban parks and urban forest parks to enhance the quality and sustainability in urban environment. The study was conducted at FRIM(Forest Research Institution of Malaysia) with 375 respondents participated in this study. It is found that the respondents' evaluation on environmental, social and physical contribution at study area is associated with great and intense values for city sustainability. Public opinion and reason to come to the study area should be taken into account by professionals since they are the users and responsible to ensure the
sustainability of urban forest for future generation. Even though the overall percentage of survey showed that public gave good expectation, however, the small percentage could be an eye opener as they assumed the existing setting will face big challenge to sustain in the future.
Downloads
References
Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 129-138.
Coley, R., Kuo, F., & Sullivan, W. (1997). Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Behavior, 29, 468-494.
Conway, H. (1991). People's parks: The design and development of Victorian Parks in Britain. Cambridge University Press.
Grey, G.W and Deneke, F.J.(1989). Urban forestry. Second edition. John Wiley and Sons. New York, U.S.A.
Hammitt, W. E. (2002). Urban Forests and parks as privacy refuges. Journal of Arboriculture, 28, 19-26.
Hisham, M.A.(2008). Motives for participation into Continuing Professional Development Activities by Malaysian Licensed/ Registered Professionals in the Construction and Real Estate Industries. Unpublished research, Universiti Teknologi MARA.
Hull, R. B., & Stewart, W. P. (1995). The landscape encountered and experience while hiking. Environment and Behavior, 27, 404-426. http://www.frim.gov.my http://www.uncsd2012.org
Justice, C.L. (1986). The concept of the urban forest as applied to Kuala Lumpur. Journal of Arboriculture, 12, 178-181.
Kaplan, R. (1973). Some psychological benefits of gardening. Environmental Behavior, 5, 145-152.
Lo, A.Y.H., and Jim, C.Y (2010). Differential community effects on perception and use of urban greenspaces. Landuse policy, 6, 430-442
Matsuoka, R. H., and Kaplan, R. (2008). People needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84, 7-19.
Noor Azlin, Y., and Sabri, N. (1997). Forest recreation environment: Visitors preferences and perceptions. FRIM, 1, 1-12.
Noor Azlin, Y and Ahmad Nazaruddin, M.R. (2003). Benefits of urban forest: FRIM Papers: Habitat Malaysia, 7, 80-87.
Noriah, O. (2004). A cross cultural comparison on preferences towards selected urban landscape planting compositions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi MARA.
Nor' A aini, O., and Kamarul Ain, K. (2007, November). Keeping the green in urban area: An approach towards sustainable development. Proceeding of the Seminar Kebangsaan Rupabandar Malaysia, 28 - 29 November 2007, Lumut, Perak.
Noralizawati, M. (2009). Public Preferences Towards Naturalistic and Designed Landscape Pattern. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi MARA. Noralizawati, M. (2011). Assesing the Visual Quality of Penang Botanical Garden. Unpublished research report, Universiti Teknologi MARA.
Oku, H., and Fukamachi, K. (2006). The differences in scenic perception of forest visitors through their attributes and recreational activity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 34- 42.
Ozguner, H., and Kendle, A. D. (2007). Attitudes of landscape professionals towards naturalistic versus formal urban landscapes in the UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81,34-45.
Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Allen and Unwin.
Park, B.J. (2011). Relationship between psychological responses and physical environments in forest settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101, 117-145.
Schroeder, H. W. (1986). Estimating park tree densities to maximize landscape aesthetics. Journal of Environmental Management, 23, 325- 333.
Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Sreetheran, M., and Kamariah, D. (2007). Performance indicators to evaluate urban parks from the saftey and security perspective. Proceeding of the Seminar Kebangsaan Rupabandar Malaysia. 28- 29 November 2007, Lumut, Perak.
Todorova, A., Asakawa, S., & Aikoh, T. (2004). Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 403- 416.
Tsunetsugu, B. (2010). Shirinyoku: Taking in the Forest Atmosphere and Forest Bathing in Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 151, 27-37.
Yang, B. E., & Brown, T. J. (1992). A cross- cultural comparison of preferences for landscape styles and landscape elements. Journal of Environmental Behavior, 24(4), 471-507.
Yin, N.S and Siong, H.C. (2010). The relationship between urban population density and transportation fuel consumption in Malaysian cities. Journal of Planning Malaysia, 8, 45-66.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright & Creative Commons Licence
eISSN: 0128-0945 © Year. The Authors. Published for Malaysia Institute of Planners. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors hold the copyright without restrictions and also retain publishing rights without restrictions.
