THE INTERPLAY OF SPATIAL POLICY, TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND AIR QUALITY IN ISKANDAR MALAYSIA

Authors

  • Ariva Sugandi Permana Faculty of Built Environment UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • Ahmad Nazri Muhamad Ludin Faculty of Built Environment UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
  • M. Rafee Majid UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i3.293

Keywords:

Spatial policy, spatial structure, travel behaviour, growth centre, transport energy, air quality

Abstract

Iskandar Malaysia has been emerging as a centre of economic growth in the southern corridor of Malaysia. While the present spatial policy has emboldened the growth centre that inspires the urban development in the region to flourish, the spatial development has brought a substantial environmental consequence to urban areas. With the support of travel behaviour of the citizens as a catalyst, the interplay between spatial policy and urban air quality in the region becomes a major concern. This study began by undertaking spatial policy analysis at local and federal levels. Then, an origin-destination study was carried out to assess the travel behaviour of citizens and the concentricity or poly-centricity of the region
as an eventual reflection of spatial policy. Based on the information on travel behaviour and number of vehicles in Iskandar Malaysia, the vehicle-kilometre travelled (VKT) was estimated as well as the carbon emission from the transport sector. An ethnographic survey was also conducted to understand the nonmotorized travel behaviour of the citizens i.e. willingness to walk. This survey was to crosscheck and confirm the willingness to walk of the citizens resulting from questionnaire survey. Results of the study reveal that the spatial policies of Iskandar Malaysia along with the travel behaviour of the citizens have strongly shaped the present spatial structure of Iskandar Malaysia region, and ultimately lead to ever increasing air pollution in the region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahearn, T. (1997). Urban air pollution, current policy approaches to improving air quality in Australia: the inquiry into urban air pollution in Australia. Environmental Protection Authority, Melbourne, Australia.

Anderson, W., Pavlos, P., Kanaroglou, S., & Miller, E. J. (1996). Urban form, energy and environment: A review of issues, evidence and policy. Urban Studies, 33(1), 7-35.

Banister, D, & Lichfield, N. (1995). The key issues in transport and urban development. In D. Banister (Ed). Transport and urban development. London: E&FN SPON.

Brandi, A. S., Nigro, G. M., & Petrelli, M. (2014). Development of an integrated transport-land use model for the activities relocation in urban areas. Transportation Research Procedia, 3 (2014), 374-383.

Breheny, M. (1995). Transport planning, energy and development: improving our understanding of the basic relationship. In D. Banister (Ed). Transport and urban development. London: E&FN SPON.

Cervero, R. (1996). Mixed land uses and commuting: evidence from the American housing survey. Transportation Research, 30(5), 361-377.

Chen, S., Chen, L., Liu, Q., Li, X., & Tan, Q. (2005). Remote sensing and GIS-based integrated analysis of coastal changes and their environmental impacts in Lingding Bay, Pearl River Estuary, South China. Ocean & Coastal Management, 48, 65-83.

Chen, Y., Chang, K., Han, F., Karacsonyi, D., & Qian, Q. (2015). Investigating urbanization and its spatial determinants in the central districts of Guangzhou, China. Habitat International, 51:59-69. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j .habitatint.2015.10.013.

City of Westminster (2016). Policy, performance and communications. Retrieved June 7, 2016 from https://www.westminster.gov.uk/policy-performance-and-communications.

European Environment Agency (2001). Joint emep/corinair atmospheric emission inventory guidebook (Third edition). Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.

Hickman, R., & Banister, D. (2007). Transportation and reduced energy consumption: what role can urban planning play? Working Paper #1026, Transport Studies Unit, Oxford University Centre for the Environment.

Iskandar Regional Development Authority (Act 664), (2007).

Iskandar Region Development Authority, IRDA (2016). Official website of IRDA. Retrieved on March 20, 2016, http://www.irda.com.my.

Keuken, M. (2002). Impact of local traffic measures on urban air quality; heaven for sustainability mobility urban transport, air quality and noise. Heaven, the Netherlands.

Koomen, E., & van Beurden (Eds.) (2011). Land use modelling in planning practice. Springer Dordrecht. DOI: DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1822-7.

Mirabaud, P., & Deberre, J. C. (2006). Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development Policy in France. Inter-ministerial Agency for Spatial Planning and Competitiveness. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of France. ISBN: 978-2-11-096447-2.

Mittal M. L., & Sharma, C. (2003). Anthropogenic emissions from energy activities in India: generation and source characterization (Part II: emissions from vehicular transport in India.http://www.osc.edu/research/pcrm/emissions/India_Report_1Pagelayout.pdf.

Newman, P. W. G., & Kenworthy, J. R. (1989). Cities and automobile dependence: A sourcebook. Aldershot: Gower Technical.

Owens, S. E. (1992). Energy, environmental sustainability and land use planning. In M. J. Breheny (Ed.), Sustainable and urban form. London: Pion.

Permana A. S., Perera, R., Aziz, N. A., & Ho, C. S. (2015a). Creating the synergy of land use, transport, energy and environment elements towards climate change co-benefits. IJBES 2(1), 17-28. DOI: 10.11113/ijbes.v2.n1.53

Permana A. S., Perera, R., Aziz, N. A., & Ho, C. S. (2015b). Corroborating the land use change as primary determinant of air quality degradation in a concentric city. IJBES, 2(2), 75-84. DOI: 10.11113/ijbes.v2.n2.60

Proost, S., & van Dender (2012). Energy and environment challenges in the transport sector. Economics of Transportation,1, 77-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecotra.2012.11.001.

Steemers, K. (2003). Energy and the city: Density, buildings and transport.

Energy and buildings, 35(1), 3-14.

Wang, Y., Monzon, A., & Ciommo, F. D. (2015). Assessing the accessibility impact of transport policy by a land-use and transport interaction model -The case of Madrid. Computers, environment and urban systems, 49, 126135. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.03.005.

Warren, J. P., & Enoch, M. P. (2006). Mobility, energy, and emissions in Cuba and Florida. Transportation Research Part D, 11, 33-44.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-11

How to Cite

Permana, A. S., Muhamad Ludin, A. N., & Majid, M. R. (2017). THE INTERPLAY OF SPATIAL POLICY, TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND AIR QUALITY IN ISKANDAR MALAYSIA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v15i3.293

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>